Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19432983›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2009

Genomic and genetic analyses of diversity and plant interactions of Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Mark W Silby, Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga, Georgios S Vernikos, Stephen R Giddens, Robert W Jackson, Gail M Preston, Xue-Xian Zhang, Christina D Moon, Stefanie M Gehrig, Scott A C Godfrey and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 210 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Jumbo phage-mediated transduction of genomic islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Expanding theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Mark W SilbyDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Centre for Adaptation Genetics and Drug Resistance, Boston, MA 02111, USA. mark.silby@tufts.edu
Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga
Georgios S Vernikos
Stephen R Giddens
Robert W Jackson
Gail M Preston
Xue-Xian Zhang
Christina D Moon
Stefanie M Gehrig
Scott A C Godfrey
Christopher G Knight
Jacob G Malone
Zena Robinson
Andrew J Spiers
Simon Harris
Gregory L Challis
Alice M Yaxley
David Harris
Kathy Seeger
Lee Murphy
Simon Rutter
Rob Squares
Michael A Quail
Elizabeth Saunders
Konstantinos Mavromatis
Thomas S Brettin
Stephen D Bentley
Joanne Hothersall
Elton Stephens
Christopher M Thomas
Julian Parkhill
Stuart B Levy
Paul B Rainey
Nicholas R Thomson

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 104/P16729Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council P15257Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPseudomonas fluorescens are common soil bacteria that can improve plant health through nutrient cycling, pathogen antagonism and induction of plant defenses. The genome sequences of strains SBW25 and Pf0-1 were determined and compared to each other and with P. fluorescens Pf-5. A functional genomic in vivo expression technology (IVET) screen provided insight into genes used by P. fluorescens in its natural environment and an improved understanding of the ecological significance of diversity within this species.

resultsComparisons of three P. fluorescens genomes (SBW25, Pf0-1, Pf-5) revealed considerable divergence: 61% of genes are shared, the majority located near the replication origin. Phylogenetic and average amino acid identity analyses showed a low overall relationship. A functional screen of SBW25 defined 125 plant-induced genes including a range of functions specific to the plant environment. Orthologues of 83 of these exist in Pf0-1 and Pf-5, with 73 shared by both strains. The P. fluorescens genomes carry numerous complex repetitive DNA sequences, some resembling Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Elements (MITEs). In SBW25, repeat density and distribution revealed 'repeat deserts' lacking repeats, covering approximately 40% of the genome.

conclusionsP. fluorescens genomes are highly diverse. Strain-specific regions around the replication terminus suggest genome compartmentalization. The genomic heterogeneity among the three strains is reminiscent of a species complex rather than a single species. That 42% of plant-inducible genes were not shared by all strains reinforces this conclusion and shows that ecological success requires specialized and core functions. The diversity also indicates the significant size of genetic information within the Pseudomonas pan genome.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenome, BacterialPlantsPseudomonas fluorescens

Identifiers

PMID19432983
PMCPMC2718517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.