Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2009
Montelukast in the treatment of duodenal eosinophilia in children with dyspepsia: effect on eosinophil density and activation in relation to pharmacokinetics.
Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Montelukast in the Treatment of Duodenal Eosinophilia in Children With Dyspepsia: Effect on Eosinophil Density and Activation in Relation to Pharmacokinetics
Predictors of Clinical Response to Montelukast in Children With Functional Dyspepsia
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over Trial of Ketotifen in Children and Adolescents With Functional Dyspepsia in Association With Duodenal Eosinophilia
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased Duodenal Eosinophil Degranulation in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Prospective Study.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Role of the duodenal microbiota in functional dyspepsia.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022Review
- Immune Activation in Functional Dyspepsia: Bystander Becoming the Suspect.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Functional Dyspepsia and Duodenal Eosinophil Count and Degranulation: A Multiethnic US Veteran Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Eosinophilic Gastritis/Gastroenteritis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2021Review
- Update on the Role of Allergy in Pediatric Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders: A Clinical Perspective.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: diagnosis and clinical perspectives.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Quantitative Analysis of Distribution of the Gastrointestinal Tract Eosinophils in Childhood Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2018Article
- Immunopathological and molecular basis of functional dyspepsia and current therapeutic approaches.Expert review of clinical immunology · 2018Review
- Functional dyspepsia.Australian prescriber · 2017Review
- Analysis of Gastric and Duodenal Eosinophils in Children with Abdominal Pain Related Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders According to Rome III Criteria.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016Article
- The Gastric and Duodenal Eosinophilia in Functional Dyspepsia.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016Article
- Women and functional dyspepsia.Women's health (London, England) · 2016Article
- Intestinal permeability in children/adolescents with functional dyspepsia.BMC research notes · 2014Observational
- Eosinophils and mast cells as therapeutic targets in pediatric functional dyspepsia.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2013Review
- The role of eosinophils and mast cells in intestinal functional disease.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011Review
- Cysteinyl leukotrienes acting via granule membrane-expressed receptors elicit secretion from within cell-free human eosinophil granules.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe have previously demonstrated the clinical efficacy of montelukast in a randomized double-blind controlled cross-over trial in patients with dyspepsia in association with duodenal eosinophilia. The mechanism of this clinical response is unknown but could involve a decrease in eosinophil density or activation.
methodsTwenty-four dyspeptic patients 8-17 years of age underwent initial blood sampling and endoscopy with biopsy. Eighteen of these patients had elevated duodenal eosinophil density and underwent repeat blood sampling and endoscopy following 21 days of therapy with montelukast (10 mg/day). The following were determined: global clinical response on a 5-point Lickert-type scale, eosinophil density utilizing H & E staining, eosinophil activation determined by degranulation indices on electron microscopy, and serum cytokine concentrations. On day 21, pharmacokinetics and duodenal mucosal drug concentrations were determined.
resultsEighty-three percent of the patients had a positive clinical response to montelukast with regard to relief of pain with 50% having a complete or nearly complete clinical response. The response was unrelated to systemic drug exposure or to mucosal drug concentration. Other than a mild decrease in eosinophil density in the second portion of the duodenum, there were no significant changes in eosinophil density, eosinophil activation, or serum cytokine concentrations following treatment with montelukast. Pre-treatment TNF-alpha concentration was negatively correlated with clinical response.
conclusionThe short-term clinical response to montelukast does not appear to result from changes in eosinophil density or activation. Whether the effect is mediated through specific mediators or non-inflammatory cells such as enteric nerves remains to be determined.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00148603.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.