Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19432499›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2009

Topical 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational efficacy and safety trial.

Andreas Binder, Jean Bruxelle, Peter Rogers, Guy Hans, Irmgard Bösl, Ralf Baron

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03745404 (A Double-blind, Multicentre, Multiple-dose, Enriched Enrolment, Randomized-withdrawal, Parallel-group Phase III Study With Lido-Patch and Corresponding Placebo Plaster in Patients Suffering From Postherpetic Neuralgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03745404 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Multicentre, Multiple-dose, Enriched Enrolment, Randomized-withdrawal, Parallel-group Phase III Study With Lido-Patch and Corresponding Placebo Plaster in Patients Suffering From Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrünenthal GmbHRan2003 to 2004Enrolled265ConditionsPost Herpetic NeuralgiaArmsLidocaine 5% medicated Plaster, Placebo Plaster
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 8. Herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Topical Lidocaine for Chronic Pain Treatment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. [Therapy of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019
    Article
  17. Early experience with topical meloxicam and lidocaine combination for the treatment of vulvodynia.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  18. Topical Treatments for Localized Neuropathic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2017
    Review
  19. Neuropathic pain.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andreas BinderDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Jean Bruxelle
Peter Rogers
Guy Hans
Irmgard Bösl
Ralf Baron
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEAntwerp University Hospital · BEGrünenthal Group (Germany) · DEHôpital Cochin · FRSt. Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePost-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a distressing neuropathic pain condition mainly affecting elderly patients. Neuropathic pain symptoms can be of a burning, shooting and stabbing nature, and may continue for prolonged periods and are often poorly controlled by polymedication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of topical analgesic treatment (5% lidocaine [lignocaine] medicated plaster) compared with placebo plaster in patients with PHN.

methodsThis was a double-blind, placebo plaster-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study employing enriched enrolment with randomized withdrawal methodology. After an initial 8-week open-label, active run-in phase, responders entered a 2-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. The study was conducted at 33 outpatient investigational centres in 12 European countries. Patients with PHN were selected who were aged >/=50 years, had experienced neuropathic pain persisting for >/=3 months after rash healing, and had a mean pain intensity of >/=4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale. A total of 265 patients entered the open-label phase and subsequently a pre-defined number of 71 patients entered the randomized phase. Patients applied up to three 5% lidocaine medicated plasters for up to 12 hours per day. The primary endpoint of the study was time-to-exit due to a >/=2-point reduction in pain relief on two consecutive days of plaster application using a 6-point verbal rating scale.

resultsOf the 265 patients entering the run-in phase, 51.7% achieved at least moderate pain relief. In the double-blind phase (full analysis set, n = 71), median times-to-exit were 13.5 (range 2-14) and 9.0 (range 1-14) days for lidocaine and placebo plaster groups, respectively (p = 0.151). For per-protocol patients (n = 34), median time-to-exit was 14.0 (range 3-14) and 6.0 (range 1-14) days for lidocaine and placebo plaster groups, respectively (p = 0.0398). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 13.6% of patients. Treatment with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster was associated with improvements in pain, allodynia, quality of life and sleep measures.

conclusionsThis study adds to a growing body of evidence that the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster can be considered a valuable treatment option for patients with PHN, providing beneficial effects on pain, allodynia, quality of life and sleep, with minimal adverse effects.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEuropeFemaleHumansLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgia, PostherpeticPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID19432499
OpenAlexW2097436572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.