Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19430879›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2009

Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: guidelines development, value and application.

Jeffrey J Olson, Camilo E Fadul, Daniel J Brat, Srinivasan Mukundan, Timothy C Ryken

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SEOM clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of glioblastoma (2017).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Introduction, rationale, and methodology.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014
    Article
  16. Operability of glioblastomas: "sins of action" versus "sins of non-action".Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey J OlsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. jeffrey.olson@emory.org
Camilo E Fadul
Daniel J Brat
Srinivasan Mukundan
Timothy C Ryken

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The movement to create guidelines for management of medical maladies has been gaining strength for quality, academic, financial and political purposes over the past two decades. This applies to neurological diseases, too. Evidence-based guidelines created in a multidisciplinary fashion using predetermined criteria for grading scientific data and translating this to similarly ranked recommendations is a valuable approach to meeting this goal. The following is a summary of the methods used for, and the results of, an evidence-based guideline for the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. In addition to outlining recommendations by discipline, it also addresses how concerns and conflicts were addressed in their development and provides comment on future directions in management of this situation that may improve outcome. It is important that clinicians directly experienced in patient management take the lead in creation of guidelines related to the diseases they deal with, as these clinicians are clearly the most suited to being able to arrive at a meaningful and useful product.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEvidence-Based MedicineGlioblastomaHumansPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.