ArticleSurgical endoscopy2009
The minimal clinically important difference in the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index after cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on key controversies in the management of diverticular disease: a multi-society collaboration.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Perioperative Probiotics Application for Preventing Postoperative Complications in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- High Versus Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- MANagement of Gallstone disease in the Older patient (MANGO): clinical and quality of life outcomes from a prospective multicentre cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
- The minimally important difference of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index for symptomatic gallstone surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy (rTMS) for Endometriosis Patients with Refractory Pelvic Chronic Pain: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Health-related quality of life outcomes after cholecystectomy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Review
- Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective piecewise linear regression analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Response shift effect on gastrointestinal quality of life index after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is unknown, which limits its application and interpretation. This study aimed to estimate MCIDs for the GIQLI scores of patients after they had undergone cholecystectomy.
methodsThis study had 267 participants. All the participants completed the GIQLI and four anchor items, namely, "How would you describe your overall symptoms, emotions, physical functions, and social functions since your last visit?" The response options were "much worse," "somewhat worse," "same," "somewhat better" and "much better." The MCID was defined according to those who responded with "somewhat better."
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 57.81 ± 14.93 years, and 37.08% of the patients were women. The MCID group included 67, 78, 44, and 22 patients with MCIDs of 6.42, 6.86, 7.64 and 6.46 points respectively for scores on the symptoms, emotions, physical functions, and social functions subscales, respectively. The effect sizes of four anchors in the "somewhat better" group (0.38-0.49) exceeded those of the same group (0.25-0.38).
conclusionsThis study showed that after patients had undergone cholecystectomy, the clinically significant mean changes in their scores on the GIQLI subscales for symptoms, emotions, physical functions, and social function were respectively 6.42, 6.86, 7.64, and 6.46 points. After patients have undergone cholecystectomy, the MCIDs for the GIQLI subscales can play an important role in interpretation of the scores, application of them in clinical practice, and verification of treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19430834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.