Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19430834›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2009

The minimal clinically important difference in the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index after cholecystectomy.

Hon-Yi Shi, King-Teh Lee, Hao-Hsien Lee, Yih-Huei Uen, Hsueh-Li Na, Fang-Tse Chao, Chong-Chi Chiu

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Response shift effect on gastrointestinal quality of life index after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hon-Yi ShiGraduate Institute of Healthcare Administration, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road, 807 Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
King-Teh Lee
Hao-Hsien Lee
Yih-Huei Uen
Hsueh-Li Na
Fang-Tse Chao
Chong-Chi Chiu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is unknown, which limits its application and interpretation. This study aimed to estimate MCIDs for the GIQLI scores of patients after they had undergone cholecystectomy.

methodsThis study had 267 participants. All the participants completed the GIQLI and four anchor items, namely, "How would you describe your overall symptoms, emotions, physical functions, and social functions since your last visit?" The response options were "much worse," "somewhat worse," "same," "somewhat better" and "much better." The MCID was defined according to those who responded with "somewhat better."

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 57.81 ± 14.93 years, and 37.08% of the patients were women. The MCID group included 67, 78, 44, and 22 patients with MCIDs of 6.42, 6.86, 7.64 and 6.46 points respectively for scores on the symptoms, emotions, physical functions, and social functions subscales, respectively. The effect sizes of four anchors in the "somewhat better" group (0.38-0.49) exceeded those of the same group (0.25-0.38).

conclusionsThis study showed that after patients had undergone cholecystectomy, the clinically significant mean changes in their scores on the GIQLI subscales for symptoms, emotions, physical functions, and social function were respectively 6.42, 6.86, 7.64, and 6.46 points. After patients have undergone cholecystectomy, the MCIDs for the GIQLI subscales can play an important role in interpretation of the scores, application of them in clinical practice, and verification of treatment effects.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicEmotionsFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.