Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19430775›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2009

Sponge spicules as blueprints for the biofabrication of inorganic-organic composites and biomaterials.

Werner E G Müller, Xiaohong Wang, Fu-Zhai Cui, Klaus Peter Jochum, Wolfgang Tremel, Joachim Bill, Heinz C Schröder, Filipe Natalio, Ute Schlossmacher, Matthias Wiens

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Co-option of Lysosomal Machinery for Sponge Biosilicification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The developmental biology ofScience advances · 2021
    Article
  8. In Vitro Mineralization of Collagen.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Werner E G MüllerDepartment for Applied Molecular Biology, Institute for Physiological Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Duesbergweg 6, 55099 Mainz, Germany. wmueller@uni-mainz.de
Xiaohong Wang
Fu-Zhai Cui
Klaus Peter Jochum
Wolfgang Tremel
Joachim Bill
Heinz C Schröder
Filipe Natalio
Ute Schlossmacher
Matthias Wiens
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · DETsinghua University · CNUniversity of Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While most forms of multicellular life have developed a calcium-based skeleton, a few specialized organisms complement their body plan with silica. However, of all recent animals, only sponges (phylum Porifera) are able to polymerize silica enzymatically mediated in order to generate massive siliceous skeletal elements (spicules) during a unique reaction, at ambient temperature and pressure. During this biomineralization process (i.e., biosilicification) hydrated, amorphous silica is deposited within highly specialized sponge cells, ultimately resulting in structures that range in size from micrometers to meters. Spicules lend structural stability to the sponge body, deter predators, and transmit light similar to optic fibers. This peculiar phenomenon has been comprehensively studied in recent years and in several approaches, the molecular background was explored to create tools that might be employed for novel bioinspired biotechnological and biomedical applications. Thus, it was discovered that spiculogenesis is mediated by the enzyme silicatein and starts intracellularly. The resulting silica nanoparticles fuse and subsequently form concentric lamellar layers around a central protein filament, consisting of silicatein and the scaffold protein silintaphin-1. Once the growing spicule is extruded into the extracellular space, it obtains final size and shape. Again, this process is mediated by silicatein and silintaphin-1, in combination with other molecules such as galectin and collagen. The molecular toolbox generated so far allows the fabrication of novel micro- and nanostructured composites, contributing to the economical and sustainable synthesis of biomaterials with unique characteristics. In this context, first bioinspired approaches implement recombinant silicatein and silintaphin-1 for applications in the field of biomedicine (biosilica-mediated regeneration of tooth and bone defects) or micro-optics (in vitro synthesis of light waveguides) with promising results.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsPoriferaSilicon DioxideBiocompatible MaterialsSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID19430775
PMCPMC2755733
OpenAlexW2051852674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.