Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19430533›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

To be or not to be a flatworm: the acoel controversy.

Bernhard Egger, Dirk Steinke, Hiroshi Tarui, Katrien De Mulder, Detlev Arendt, Gaëtan Borgonie, Noriko Funayama, Robert Gschwentner, Volker Hartenstein, Bert Hobmayer and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Studying Xenacoelomorpha WBR Using Isodiametra pulchra.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural architecture and regeneration in the acoelProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Draft genome ofZoological letters · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome and transcriptome of the regeneration-competent flatworm, Macrostomum lignano.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Bernhard EggerInstitute of Zoology and Center for Molecular Biosciences, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dirk Steinke
Hiroshi Tarui
Katrien De Mulder
Detlev Arendt
Gaëtan Borgonie
Noriko Funayama
Robert Gschwentner
Volker Hartenstein
Bert Hobmayer
Matthew Hooge
Martina Hrouda
Sachiko Ishida
Chiyoko Kobayashi
Georg Kuales
Osamu Nishimura
Daniela Pfister
Reinhard Rieger
Willi Salvenmoser
Julian Smith
Ulrich Technau
Seth Tyler
Kiyokazu Agata
Walter Salzburger
Peter Ladurner
Universität Innsbruck · ATKyoto University · JPGhent University · BEUniversity of Maine · USEuropean Molecular Biology Organization · DEHirosaki University · JPKumamoto University · JPUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Vienna · ATWinthrop University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since first described, acoels were considered members of the flatworms (Platyhelminthes). However, no clear synapomorphies among the three large flatworm taxa -- the Catenulida, the Acoelomorpha and the Rhabditophora -- have been characterized to date. Molecular phylogenies, on the other hand, commonly positioned acoels separate from other flatworms. Accordingly, our own multi-locus phylogenetic analysis using 43 genes and 23 animal species places the acoel flatworm Isodiametra pulchra at the base of all Bilateria, distant from other flatworms. By contrast, novel data on the distribution and proliferation of stem cells and the specific mode of epidermal replacement constitute a strong synapomorphy for the Acoela plus the major group of flatworms, the Rhabditophora. The expression of a piwi-like gene not only in gonadal, but also in adult somatic stem cells is another unique feature among bilaterians. These two independent stem-cell-related characters put the Acoela into the Platyhelminthes-Lophotrochozoa clade and account for the most parsimonious evolutionary explanation of epidermal cell renewal in the Bilateria. Most available multigene analyses produce conflicting results regarding the position of the acoels in the tree of life. Given these phylogenomic conflicts and the contradiction of developmental and morphological data with phylogenomic results, the monophyly of the phylum Platyhelminthes and the position of the Acoela remain unresolved. By these data, both the inclusion of Acoela within Platyhelminthes, and their separation from flatworms as basal bilaterians are well-supported alternatives.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsCell MovementCell ProliferationEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionHelminth ProteinsIn Situ HybridizationModels, GeneticPlatyhelminthsStem CellsHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19430533
PMCPMC2676513
OpenAlexW2110909120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.