ArticleNucleic acids research2009
Sim4cc: a cross-species spliced alignment program.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new rhesus macaque assembly and annotation for next-generation sequencing analyses.Biology direct · 2014Article
- Rapid evolution of PARP genes suggests a broad role for ADP-ribosylation in host-virus conflicts.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
- Improving genome assemblies and annotations for nonhuman primates.ILAR journal · 2013Review
- Benchmarking spliced alignment programs including Spaln2, an extended version of Spaln that incorporates additional species-specific features.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- HaploMerger: reconstructing allelic relationships for polymorphic diploid genome assemblies.Genome research · 2012Article
- Comparative evaluation of intron prediction methods and detection of plant genome annotation using intron length distributions.Genomics & informatics · 2012Article
- Detection of lineage-specific evolutionary changes among primate species.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Sim4db and Leaff: utilities for fast batch spliced alignment and sequence indexing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- Efficient plant gene identification based on interspecies mapping of full-length cDNAs.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in sequencing technologies have accelerated the sequencing of new genomes, far outpacing the generation of gene and protein resources needed to annotate them. Direct comparison and alignment of existing cDNA sequences from a related species is an effective and readily available means to determine genes in the new genomes. Current spliced alignment programs are inadequate for comparing sequences between different species, owing to their low sensitivity and splice junction accuracy. A new spliced alignment tool, sim4cc, overcomes problems in the earlier tools by incorporating three new features: universal spaced seeds, to increase sensitivity and allow comparisons between species at various evolutionary distances, and powerful splice signal models and evolutionarily-aware alignment techniques, to improve the accuracy of gene models. When tested on vertebrate comparisons at diverse evolutionary distances, sim4cc had significantly higher sensitivity compared to existing alignment programs, more than 10% higher than the closest competitor for some comparisons, while being comparable in speed to its predecessor, sim4. Sim4cc can be used in one-to-one or one-to-many comparisons of genomic and cDNA sequences, and can also be effectively incorporated into a high-throughput annotation engine, as demonstrated by the mapping of 64,000 Fagus grandifolia 454 ESTs and unigenes to the poplar genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.