Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19429733›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Diffusion of breast cancer risk assessment in primary care.

Carmen E Guerra, Melani Sherman, Katrina Armstrong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Primary care provider practices, attitudes, and confidence with hereditary cancer risk assessment and testing: A mixed methods study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Perception of Breast Cancer Risk in Over 11,000 Patients During Routine Mammography Exam.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  10. Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  11. Calling on Primary Care to Prevent BRCA-Related Cancers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Uptake of exemestane chemoprevention in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carmen E GuerraDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Melani Sherman
Katrina Armstrong

Funding

Barriers to Recommending Colorectal Cancer ScreeningK01CA097925 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUERRA, CARMEN E · 2002 to 2006
$677k
Increasing primary care physician colorectal cancer screening ratesK22CA133186 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUERRA, CARMEN E. · 2008 to 2010
$476k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA097925NCI NIH HHS K01-CA97925NCI NIH HHS K22 CA133186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians who provide primary care to women have the opportunity to identify patients at high risk for breast cancer who are candidates for risk reduction strategies. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and determinants of the adoption of breast cancer risk assessment by primary care physicians.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative random sample of 351 internists, family practitioners, and obstetricians-gynecologists. We used a questionnaire that assessed knowledge, attitudes, discussion of breast cancer risk, use of software to calculate breast cancer risk, and ordering of BRCA1/2 testing.

resultsEighty-eight percent of physicians reported discussing breast cancer risk at least once during the previous 12 months; 48% had ordered or referred a patient for BRCA1/2 testing; and 18% had used a software program to calculate breast cancer risk. Physicians who had used BRCA1/2 testing or discussed breast cancer risk factors were more likely to be obstetrician-gynecologists and not in a solo practice; the use of risk software was also more common among obstetrician-gynecologists but was also associated with having a family member with breast cancer and a greater knowledge about breast cancer risk. Having patients ask for risk information was associated with the discussion of risk factors but not with the other risk assessment strategies.

conclusionsDiffusion of breast cancer risk assessment is occurring in primary care practices, with a greater adoption of BRCA1/2 testing than of the use of risk assessment software. Adoption of these strategies seems to be related to the salience of breast cancer personally (for the physician) and within the practice, as well as the size of the practice, rather than attitudes about the risk assessment methods.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFamily PracticeFemaleGynecologyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedObstetricsPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID19429733
PMCPMC2882882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.