Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19428854›Full record

ArticleVaccine2009

Protection from Staphylococcus aureus mastitis associated with poly-N-acetyl beta-1,6 glucosamine specific antibody production using biofilm-embedded bacteria.

M M Pérez, A Prenafeta, J Valle, J Penadés, C Rota, C Solano, J Marco, M J Grilló, I Lasa, J M Irache and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Mammary Defences and Immunity against Mastitis in Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

M M PérezDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, SIA-CITA (DGA) Ctra. de Montañana, Zaragoza, Spain.
A Prenafeta
J Valle
J Penadés
C Rota
C Solano
J Marco
M J Grilló
I Lasa
J M Irache
T Maira-Litran
J Jiménez-Barbero
L Costa
G B Pier
D de Andrés
B Amorena
Agrobiotechnology Institute · ESUniversidad Publica de Navarra · ESBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas · ESCentro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón · ESDepartamento de Salud · ESGobierno de Navarra · ESHarvard University · USInstituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

Virulence and Immunity to StaphylcocciR01AI046706 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PIER, GERALD B · 2001 to 2010
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus vaccines based on bacterins surrounded by slime, surface polysaccharides coupled to protein carriers and polysaccharides embedded in liposomes administered together with non-biofilm bacterins confer protection against mastitis. However, it remains unknown whether protective antibodies are directed to slime-associated known exopolysaccharides and could be produced in the absence of bacterin immunizations. Here, a sheep mastitis vaccination study was carried out using bacterins, crude bacterial extracts or a purified exopolysaccharide from biofilm bacteria delivered in different vehicles. This polysaccharide reacted specifically with antibodies to poly-N-acetyl-beta-1,6-glucosamine (PNAG) and not with antibodies to other capsular antigens or bacterial components. Following intra-mammary challenge with biofilm-producing bacteria, antibody production against the polysaccharide, milk bacterial counts and mastitis lesions were determined. Bacterins from strong biofilm-producing bacteria triggered the highest production of antibodies to PNAG and conferred the highest protection against infection and mastitis, compared with weak biofilm-producing bacteria and non-cellular inocula. Thus, bacterins from strong biofilm bacteria, rather than purified polysaccharide, are proposed as a cost-efficient vaccination against S. aureus ruminant mastitis.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationBiofilmsAnimalsbeta-GlucansFemaleMammary Glands, AnimalMastitisMilkPregnancySheepStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal VaccinesStaphylococcus aureusTreatment Outcomebeta-Glucanspoly-N-acetyl-1-6-glucosamineStaphylococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19428854
PMCPMC3024585
OpenAlexW2031755114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.