Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19428636›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2009

Differential actions of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D2 antagonism.

John D Salamone, Andrew M Farrar, Laura Font, Vatsal Patel, Devra E Schlar, Eric J Nunes, Lyndsey E Collins, Thomas N Sager

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Adenosine AFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Allosteric Interactions between Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John D SalamoneDivision of Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020, USA. john.salamone@uconn.edu
Andrew M Farrar
Laura Font
Vatsal Patel
Devra E Schlar
Eric J Nunes
Lyndsey E Collins
Thomas N Sager
University of Connecticut · USLundbeck (Denmark) · DK

Funding

Effort-related Functions of Nucleus Accumbens Adenosine A2A ReceptorsR01MH078023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI SALAMONE, JOHN D · 2007 to 2010
$835k
NIMH NIH HHS MH078023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine and dopamine receptors in striatal areas interact to regulate a number of different functions, including aspects of motor control and motivation. Recent studies indicate that adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists can reverse the effects of dopamine (DA) D(2) antagonists on instrumental tasks that provide measures of effort-related choice behavior. The present experiments compared the ability of the adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW6002, the nonselective adenosine antagonist caffeine, and the adenosine A(1) receptor selective antagonist DPCPX, to reverse the behavioral effects of the DA D(2) antagonist haloperidol. For these studies, a concurrent choice procedure was used in which rats could select between lever pressing on a fixed ratio 5 schedule for a preferred food or approaching and consuming a less preferred lab chow that was concurrently available in the chamber. Under baseline or control conditions, rats show a strong preference for lever pressing, and eat little of the chow; IP injections of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol significantly reduced lever pressing and substantially increased chow intake. The adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW6002 (0.125-0.5 mg/kg IP) and the nonselective adenosine antagonist caffeine (5.0-20.0 mg/kg) significantly reversed the effects of haloperidol. However, the adenosine A(1) antagonist DPCPX (0.1875-0.75 mg/kg IP) failed to reverse the effects of the D(2) antagonist. The rank order of effect sizes in the reversal experiments was KW6002>caffeine>DPCPX. None of these drugs had any effect on behavior when they were injected in the absence of haloperidol. These results indicate that the ability of an adenosine antagonist to reverse the effort-related effects of a D(2) antagonist depends upon the subtype of adenosine receptor being blocked. Together with other recent results, these experiments indicate that there is a specific interaction between DA D(2) and adenosine A(2A) receptors, which could be related to the co-localization of these receptors on the same population of striatal neurons.

Indexed as

Adenosine A1 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosine A2 Receptor AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsMotivationAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaffeineCentral Nervous System AgentsChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantDopamine AntagonistsFeeding BehaviorHaloperidolMalePurines1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthineAdenosine A1 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosine A2 Receptor AntagonistsCaffeineCentral Nervous System AgentsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHaloperidolistradefyllinePurinesXanthines

Identifiers

PMID19428636
PMCPMC2806666
OpenAlexW2055674241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.