ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2009
A semi-automatic image segmentation method for extraction of brain volume from in vivo mouse head magnetic resonance imaging using Constraint Level Sets.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Androgen Receptor as a Novel Radiosensitizing Therapy to Improve Long-Term Survival and Anti-tumor Immunity in Glioblastoma via TGF-β/Smad3 Axis Reprogramming.Research square · 2026Article
- Exercise facilitates regeneration after severe nerve transection and further modulates neural plasticity.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2022Article
- Organ Contouring for Lung Cancer Patients with a Seed Generation Scheme and Random Walks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Automatic multiatlas based organ at risk segmentation in mice.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- MEMRI is a biomarker defining nicotine-specific neuronal responses in subregions of the rodent brain.American journal of translational research · 2017Article
- Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reflects Brain Pathology During Progressive HIV-1 Infection of Humanized Mice.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Article
- A simple rapid process for semi-automated brain extraction from magnetic resonance images of the whole mouse head.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2016Article
- Potential of N-acetylated-para-aminosalicylic acid to accelerate manganese enhancement decline for long-term MEMRI in rodent brain.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2015Article
- An in vivo MRI Template Set for Morphometry, Tissue Segmentation, and fMRI Localization in Rats.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2011Article
- Registered bioimaging of nanomaterials for diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of mouse brain has been widely used to non-invasively monitor disease progression and/or therapeutic effects in murine models of human neurodegenerative disease. Segmentation of MRI to differentiate brain from non-brain tissue (usually referred to as brain extraction) is required for many MRI data processing and analysis methods, including coregistration, statistical parametric analysis, and mapping to brain atlas and histology. This paper presents a semi-automatic brain extraction technique based on a level set method with the incorporation of user-defined constraints. The constraints are derived from the prior knowledge of brain anatomy by defining brain boundary on orthogonal planes of the MRI. Constraints are incorporated in the level set method by spatially varying the weighting factors of the internal and external forces and modifying the image gradient (edge) map. Both two-dimensional multislice and three-dimensional versions of the brain extraction technique were developed and applied to MRI data with minimal brain/non-brain contrast T(1)-weighted (T(1)-wt) FLASH and maximized contrast T(2)-weighted (T(2)-wt) RARE. Results were evaluated by calculating the overlap measure (OM) between the automatically segmented and manually traced brain volumes. Results demonstrate that this technique accurately extracts the brain volume (mean OM=94%) and consistently outperformed the region growing method applied to the T(2)-wt RARE MRI (mean OM=81%). This method not only successfully extracts the mouse brain in low and high contrast MRI, but can also be used to segment other organs and tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.