Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19427708›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2009

[Repeat prescription management systems: strategy for optimising their use].

Eva Llobet Traveset, Rosa Madridejos Mora, Rosa Tomás Sanz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva Llobet TravesetCAP Rambla, Unidad de Farmacia de Atención Primaria, Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España. Electronic address: ellobet@mutuaterrassa.es.
Rosa Madridejos MoraCAP Rambla, Unidad de Farmacia de Atención Primaria, Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España.
Rosa Tomás SanzCAP Rambla, Unidad de Farmacia de Atención Primaria, Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve patient compliance with a repeat prescription system. To evaluate the reasons for not being punctual in collecting prescriptions and the non-compliance declared by the patients themselves.

designQuasi-experimental study before and after intervention including a control group.

settingPrimary health care centre which serves a population of 62,981 inhabitants.

participantsPatients with chronic diseases included in the repeat prescription management system (100 in the control group and 100 in the intervention group) who were unpunctual in collecting their prescriptions.

interventionsAn informative-educational session consisting of a short interview with the pharmacist from Primary Health Care Centre, in which the patient was educated on compliance of the repeat prescription system and treatment. The reasons for the unpunctuality were identified and the Moriskey-Green test was performed. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Punctuality of the patients in collecting their prescriptions after the intervention. Reasons for unpunctuality recorded at recruitment. Therapeutic compliance according to the Moriskey-Green test.

resultsThere was an overall absolute improvement of 17% in punctuality in the intervention group (60% of the patients in the intervention group and 43% in the control group were punctual in the first as well as in the second follow up. Women were more punctual in the intervention group. There were no differences seen due to age, number of medications or reason for unpunctuality.

conclusionsIt is possible to improve patient compliance with the prescription renewal system using a simple informative-educational intervention.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID19427708
PMCPMC7665096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.