ReviewBMC public health2009
Preventing socioeconomic inequalities in health behaviour in adolescents in Europe: background, design and methods of project TEENAGE.
Review in BMC public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining subgroup effects by socioeconomic status of public health interventions targeting multiple risk behaviour in adolescence.BMC public health · 2018Pooled it
- Socioeconomic gradients in the effects of universal school-based health behaviour interventions: a systematic review of intervention studies.BMC public health · 2015Pooled it
- Does neighbourhood social capital aid in levelling the social gradient in the health and well-being of children and adolescents? A literature review.BMC public health · 2013Pooled it
- Exploring subgroup effects by socioeconomic position of three effective school-based dietary interventions: the European TEENAGE project.International journal of public health · 2014Trial
- The influence of socioeconomic environment on the effectiveness of alcohol prevention among European students: a cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2011Trial
- "Socioeconomic inequalities in health behaviors in children and adolescents: evidence from an Australian cohort".BMC public health · 2025Article
- Nonusage Attrition of Adolescents in an mHealth Promotion Intervention and the Role of Socioeconomic Status: Secondary Analysis of a 2-Arm Cluster-Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Article
- Local Inequalities in Health Behaviours: Longitudinal Findings from the Stockton-On-Tees Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles to Teenagers with Mobile Devices: A Case Study in Portugal.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The association of healthy lifestyle behaviors with mental health indicators among adolescents of different family affluence in Belgium.BMC public health · 2020Article
- The role of curriculum dose for the promotion of fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents: results from the Boost intervention.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Individual and environmental factors determining sedentary lifestyle of the polish population.Iranian journal of public health · 2014Article
- Article
- Explaining educational inequalities in adolescent life satisfaction: do health behaviour and gender matter?International journal of public health · 2014Article
- Socioeconomic differences in selected dietary habits among Norwegian 13-14 year-olds: a cross-sectional study.Food & nutrition research · 2014Article
- Article
- Evolution of educational inequalities in mortality among young adults in an urban setting.International journal of public health · 2013Article
- Can differences in physical activity by socio-economic status in European adolescents be explained by differences in psychosocial correlates? A mediation analysis within the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) study.Public health nutrition · 2012Article
- Age and gender differences in the social patterning of cardiovascular risk factors in Switzerland: the CoLaus study.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigher prevalence rates of unhealthy behaviours among lower socioeconomic groups contribute substantially to socioeconomic inequalities in health in adults. Preventing the development of these inequalities in unhealthy behaviours early in life is an important strategy to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in health. Little is known however, about health promotion strategies particularly effective in lower socioeconomic groups in youth. It is the purpose of project TEENAGE to improve knowledge on the prevention of socioeconomic inequalities in physical activity, diet, smoking and alcohol consumption among adolescents in Europe. This paper describes the background, design and methods to be used in the project. METHODS/
designThrough a systematic literature search, existing interventions aimed at promoting physical activity, a healthy diet, preventing the uptake of smoking or alcohol, and evaluated in the general adolescent population in Europe will be identified. Studies in which indicators of socioeconomic position are included will be reanalysed by socioeconomic position. Results of such stratified analyses will be summarised by type of behaviour, across behaviours by type of intervention (health education, environmental interventions and policies) and by setting (individual, household, school, and neighbourhood). In addition, the degree to which effective interventions can be transferred to other European countries will be assessed. DISCUSSION: Although it is sometimes assumed that some health promotion strategies may be particularly effective in higher socioeconomic groups, thereby increasing socioeconomic inequalities in health-related behaviour, there is little knowledge about differential effects of health promotion across socioeconomic groups. Synthesizing stratified analyses of a number of interventions conducted in the general adolescent population may offer an efficient guidance for the development of strategies and interventions to prevent socioeconomic inequalities in health early in life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.