Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19425822›Full record

Trial reportJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2009

The treatment of multiple sclerosis with inosine.

Clyde E Markowitz, Sergei Spitsin, Vanessa Zimmerman, Dina Jacobs, Jayaram K Udupa, D Craig Hooper, Hilary Koprowski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis-related outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clyde E MarkowitzNeurology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sergei Spitsin
Vanessa Zimmerman
Dina Jacobs
Jayaram K Udupa
D Craig Hooper
Hilary Koprowski
University of Pennsylvania · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Inosine in the over-the-counter treatment of MSR21AT001301 · NCCIH · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI HOOPER, DOUGLAS CRAIG · 2003 to 2004
$393k
NCCIH NIH HHS AT 001301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of inosine in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of inosine administration on serum urate (UA) levels, the progression of neurologic disability, the cumulative number of new, active lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and changes in serum levels for markers of inflammation.

designOral administration of inosine was used to raise serum levels of the natural peroxynitrite scavenger UA in 16 patients with RRMS during a 1-year randomized, double-blind trial. OUTCOME MEASURES: The endpoints studied were relapse rate, disability assessed by the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), MRI, and analysis of serum levels of nitrotyrosine, and oxidative and pro-inflammatory makers.

resultsIncreased serum UA levels correlated with a significant decrease in the number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions and improved EDSS. A number of MRI intensity-based parameters were altered by inosine treatment, in certain cases correlating with changes in serum UA levels. In a patient with low serum UA and high lesion activity, raising UA levels by inosine treatment decreased serum nitrotyrosine while increasing the ratio of Th2 to Th1 cytokines in circulating cells. The only side-effect correlated with inosine treatment was kidney stone formation in 4/16 subjects.

conclusionsThese data suggest that the use of inosine to raise serum UA levels may have benefits for at least some MS patients. The effect of this treatment is likely to be a consequence of inactivation of peroxynitrite-dependent free radicals. Close monitoring of serum UA levels as well as other measures are required to avoid the potential development of kidney stones.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, OralAdultBrainCD4 Lymphocyte CountCentral Nervous SystemCross-Over StudiesCytokinesDisability EvaluationDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInosineKidney Calculi3-nitrotyrosineAdjuvants, ImmunologicCytokinesInosineTyrosineUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID19425822
PMCPMC3189001
OpenAlexW2072782691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.