Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19425501›Full record

ArticleMolekuliarnaia biologiia

[Technology of analysis of epigenetic and structural changes of epithelial tumors genome with NotI-microarrays by the example of human chromosome].

T V Pavlova, V I Kashuba, O V Muravenko, S P Yenamandra, T A Ivanova, V I Zabarovskaia, E R Rakhmanaliev, L A Petrenko, I V Pronina, V I Loginov and 4 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Molekuliarnaia biologiia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The expression status of ZIC2 as a prognostic marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T V Pavlova
V I Kashuba
O V Muravenko
S P Yenamandra
T A Ivanova
V I Zabarovskaia
E R Rakhmanaliev
L A Petrenko
I V Pronina
V I Loginov
O Iu Iurkevich
L L Kiselev
A V Zelenin
E R Zabarovskiĭ
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New comparative genome hybridization technology on NotI-microarrays is presented (Karolinska Institute International Patent WO02/086163). The method is based on comparative genome hybridization of NotI-probes from tumor and normal genomic DNA with the principle of new DNA NotI-microarrays. Using this method 181 NotI linking loci from human chromosome 3 were analyzed in 200 malignant tumor samples from different organs: kidney, lung, breast, ovary, cervical, prostate. Most frequently (more than in 30%) aberrations--deletions, methylation,--were identified in NotI-sites located in MINT24, BHLHB2, RPL15, RARbeta1, ITGA9, RBSP3, VHL, ZIC4 genes, that suggests they probably are involved in cancer development. Methylation of these genomic loci was confirmed by methylation-specific PCR and bisulfite sequencing. The results demonstrate perspective of using this method to solve some oncogenomic problems.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticChromosomes, Human, Pair 3FemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityQuantitative Trait LociNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19425501
OpenAlexW2044170819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.