Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19424842›Full record

ArticleAge (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2008

Design of aging intervention studies: the NIA interventions testing program.

N L Nadon, R Strong, R A Miller, J Nelson, M Javors, Z D Sharp, J M Peralba, D E Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pharmacology of Aging:Aging biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Quantifying the Impact of Co-Housing on Murine Aging Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N L NadonBiology of Aging Program, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Ave GW 2C231, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. nadonn@nia.nih.gov
R Strong
R A Miller
J Nelson
M Javors
Z D Sharp
J M Peralba
D E Harrison

Funding

Interventions That Retard Mammalian AgingU01AG022308 · NIA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Ronny Korstanje · 2003 to 2026
$30.5M
Center for Testing Potential Anti-Aging InterventionsU01AG022307 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI RANDY STRONG, Adam Salmon · 2004 to 2026
$26.3M
Laboratory for Anti-Geric Testing, Evaluation and ResearchU01AG022303 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RICHARD A MILLER · 2003 to 2026
$25.4M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG022303NIA NIH HHS U01 AG022307NIA NIH HHS U01 AG022308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of biogerontology has made great strides towards understanding the biological processes underlying aging, and the time is ripe to look towards applying this knowledge to the pursuit of aging interventions. Identification of safe, inexpensive, and non-invasive interventions that slow the aging process and promote healthy aging could have a significant impact on quality of life and health care expenditures for the aged. While there is a plethora of supplements and interventions on the market that purport to slow aging, the evidence to validate such claims is generally lacking. Here we describe the development of an aging interventions testing program funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) to test candidate interventions in a model system. The development of this program highlights the challenges of long-term intervention studies and provides approaches to cope with the stringent requirements of a multi-site testing program.

Identifiers

PMID19424842
PMCPMC2585647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.