Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19424419›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Repair-mediated duplication by capture of proximal chromosomal DNA has shaped vertebrate genome evolution.

John K Pace, Shurjo K Sen, Mark A Batzer, Cédric Feschotte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Repair of adjacent single-strand breaks is often accompanied by the formation of tandem sequence duplications in plant genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John K PaceDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Shurjo K Sen
Mark A Batzer
Cédric Feschotte
Louisiana State University · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

POPULATION GENETICS OF MOBILE ELEMENTSR01GM059290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BATZER, MARK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 1999 to 2018
$8.5M
Human DNA transposons: evolutionary history and genomic impactR01GM077582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2007 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077582NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM59290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM77582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a common form of cellular damage that can lead to cell death if not repaired promptly. Experimental systems have shown that DSB repair in eukaryotic cells is often imperfect and may result in the insertion of extra chromosomal DNA or the duplication of existing DNA at the breakpoint. These events are thought to be a source of genomic instability and human diseases, but it is unclear whether they have contributed significantly to genome evolution. Here we developed an innovative computational pipeline that takes advantage of the repetitive structure of genomes to detect repair-mediated duplication events (RDs) that occurred in the germline and created insertions of at least 50 bp of genomic DNA. Using this pipeline we identified over 1,000 probable RDs in the human genome. Of these, 824 were intra-chromosomal, closely linked duplications of up to 619 bp bearing the hallmarks of the synthesis-dependent strand-annealing repair pathway. This mechanism has duplicated hundreds of sequences predicted to be functional in the human genome, including exons, UTRs, intron splice sites and transcription factor binding sites. Dating of the duplication events using comparative genomics and experimental validation revealed that the mechanism has operated continuously but with decreasing intensity throughout primate evolution. The mechanism has produced species-specific duplications in all primate species surveyed and is contributing to genomic variation among humans. Finally, we show that RDs have also occurred, albeit at a lower frequency, in non-primate mammals and other vertebrates, indicating that this mechanism has been an important force shaping vertebrate genome evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAnimalsBase SequenceBiometryDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairGenetic TechniquesGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticPrimatesSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA

Identifiers

PMID19424419
PMCPMC2671141
OpenAlexW2106013806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.