ArticleEndocrinology2009
The enhanced hypercalcemic response to 20-epi-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 results from a selective and prolonged induction of intestinal calcium-regulating genes.
Article in Endocrinology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Neural Stem Cells and Vitamin D Receptor (VDR)-Mediated Cellular Signaling in the Mitigation of Neurological Diseases.Molecular neurobiology · 2022Review
- Specificity of the Redox Complex between Cytochrome P450 24A1 and Adrenodoxin Relies on Carbon-25 Hydroxylation of Vitamin-D Substrate.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2019Article
- Transgenic Expression of the Vitamin D Receptor Restricted to the Ileum, Cecum, and Colon of Vitamin D Receptor Knockout Mice Rescues Vitamin D Receptor-Dependent Rickets.Endocrinology · 2017Article
- Vitamin D: Metabolism, Molecular Mechanism of Action, and Pleiotropic Effects.Physiological reviews · 2016Review
- Mechanisms of Enhancer-mediated Hormonal Control of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Expression in Target Cells.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Mouse and human BAC transgenes recapitulate tissue-specific expression of the vitamin D receptor in mice and rescue the VDR-null phenotype.Endocrinology · 2014Article
- The future of vitamin D analogs.Frontiers in physiology · 2014Review
- Regulation of mouse Cyp24a1 expression via promoter-proximal and downstream-distal enhancers highlights new concepts of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) action.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
20-Epi-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (20-epi-1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) is a vitamin D analog that exhibits unique biologic properties. The mechanism(s) responsible for these activities remains unclear. Here we explore the ability of 20-epi-1,25(OH)(2)D(3) to induce calcemic responses in mice in vivo and identify a potential mechanism. Surprisingly, the levels of calcemia induced at 24 h after single injections of equivalent doses of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) or 20-epi-1,25(OH)(2)D(3) were similar, suggesting that both compounds were equal in both potency and efficacy. This similarity was also observed at genes involved in calcium homeostasis including, S100g (calbindin D9K), Trpv6, Cldn2 (claudin 2), Trpv5, and Tnfsf11 (Rankl) as well as Cyp24a1. Despite this, the activities of the two compounds at 48 h were strikingly different. Thus, whereas the activity of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) declined at this time point, the response to 20-epi-1,25(OH)(2)D(3) was increased. This unique profile was not due to an exaggerated induction of calcium regulating genes in the intestine, kidney, or bone but to a sustained action on these genes in the intestine. This conclusion was supported by studies using in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, which revealed a prolonged presence of vitamin D receptor and RNA polymerase II at the Trpv6 and Cyp24a1 promoters and a sustained increase in histone 4 acetylation in these gene regions as well. We conclude that 20-epi-1,25(OH)(2)D(3) displays superagonist properties largely as a result of its duration of action in the intestine. This action is likely due to a decrease in the rate of intestinal-specific degradation of the ligand rather than to an increase in the functional stability of the vitamin D receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.