Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19422688›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Improving gene-finding in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii:GreenGenie2.

Alan L Kwan, Linya Li, David C Kulp, Susan K Dutcher, Gary D Stormo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Direct visualization of degradation microcompartments at the ER membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  2. The Chlamydomonas genome project: a decade on.Trends in plant science · 2014
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomics of Volvocine Algae.Advances in botanical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alan L KwanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA. alan@ural.wustl.edu
Linya Li
David C Kulp
Susan K Dutcher
Gary D Stormo
Washington University in St. Louis · USSaint Louis University · ESUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF BASAL BODY FUNCTIONR01GM032843 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUTCHER, SUSAN K · 1985 to 2018
$5.9M
DNA PATTERN IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSISR01HG000249 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STORMO, GARY D · 1990 to 2017
$5.6M
Improved design and analysis of diploid resequencing microarraysR01HG003880 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI KULP, DAVID · 2006 to 2008
$711k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG-00249NHGRI NIH HHS HG-03880NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000249NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003880NIGMS NIH HHS GM-32843NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of whole-genome sequences allows for the identification of the entire set of protein coding genes as well as their regulatory regions. This can be accomplished using multiple complementary methods that include ESTs, homology searches and ab initio gene predictions. Previously, the Genie gene-finding algorithm was trained on a small set of Chlamydomonas genes and shown to improve the accuracy of gene prediction in this species compared to other available programs. To improve ab initio gene finding in Chlamydomonas, we assemble a new training set consisting of over 2,300 cDNAs by assembling over 167,000 Chlamydomonas EST entries in GenBank using the EST assembly tool PASA.

resultsThe prediction accuracy of our cDNA-trained gene-finder, GreenGenie2, attains 83% sensitivity and 83% specificity for exons on short-sequence predictions. We predict about 12,000 genes in the version v3 Chlamydomonas genome assembly, most of which (78%) are either identical to or significantly overlap the published catalog of Chlamydomonas genes 1. 22% of the published catalog is absent from the GreenGenie2 predictions; there is also a fraction (23%) of GreenGenie2 predictions that are absent from the published gene catalog. Randomly chosen gene models were tested by RT-PCR and most support the GreenGenie2 predictions.

conclusionThese data suggest that training with EST assemblies is highly effective and that GreenGenie2 is a valuable, complementary tool for predicting genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Indexed as

Genes, ProtozoanSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsChlamydomonas reinhardtiiComputational BiologyExpressed Sequence TagsModels, GeneticSensitivity and SpecificitySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID19422688
PMCPMC2694837
OpenAlexW2146083585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.