ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
On validation and invalidation of biological models.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biophysical models of early mammalian embryogenesis.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Hybrid modelling of biological systems using fuzzy continuous Petri nets.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- The Convergence of Cell-Based Surface Plasmon Resonance and Biomaterials: The Future of Quantifying Bio-molecular Interactions-A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Review
- Computer-Aided Whole-Cell Design: Taking a Holistic Approach by Integrating Synthetic With Systems Biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Modeling cell population dynamics.In silico biology · 2019Article
- Control mechanisms for stochastic biochemical systems via computation of reachable sets.Royal Society open science · 2017Article
- Experiment Design for Early Molecular Events in HIV Infection.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2017Article
- Numerical algebraic geometry for model selection and its application to the life sciences.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2016Article
- Mechanistic modeling confronts the complexity of molecular cell biology.Molecular biology of the cell · 2014Article
- Model selection in systems biology depends on experimental design.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- How informative is your kinetic model?: using resampling methods for model invalidation.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Validation of a model of the GAL regulatory system via robustness analysis of its bistability characteristics.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- ADMIT: a toolbox for guaranteed model invalidation, estimation and qualitative-quantitative modeling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Derivation, identification and validation of a computational model of a novel synthetic regulatory network in yeast.Journal of mathematical biology · 2011Article
- Set-base dynamical parameter estimation and model invalidation for biochemical reaction networks.BMC systems biology · 2010Article
- Discriminating between rival biochemical network models: three approaches to optimal experiment design.BMC systems biology · 2010Article
- A model invalidation-based approach for elucidating biological signalling pathways, applied to the chemotaxis pathway in R. sphaeroides.BMC systems biology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVery frequently the same biological system is described by several, sometimes competing mathematical models. This usually creates confusion around their validity, ie, which one is correct. However, this is unnecessary since validity of a model cannot be established; model validation is actually a misnomer. In principle the only statement that one can make about a system model is that it is incorrect, ie, invalid, a fact which can be established given appropriate experimental data. Nonlinear models of high dimension and with many parameters are impossible to invalidate through simulation and as such the invalidation process is often overlooked or ignored.
resultsWe develop different approaches for showing how competing ordinary differential equation (ODE) based models of the same biological phenomenon containing nonlinearities and parametric uncertainty can be invalidated using experimental data. We first emphasize the strong interplay between system identification and model invalidation and we describe a method for obtaining a lower bound on the error between candidate model predictions and data. We then turn to model invalidation and formulate a methodology for discrete-time and continuous-time model invalidation. The methodology is algorithmic and uses Semidefinite Programming as the computational tool. It is emphasized that trying to invalidate complex nonlinear models through exhaustive simulation is not only computationally intractable but also inconclusive.
conclusionBiological models derived from experimental data can never be validated. In fact, in order to understand biological function one should try to invalidate models that are incompatible with available data. This work describes a framework for invalidating both continuous and discrete-time ODE models based on convex optimization techniques. The methodology does not require any simulation of the candidate models; the algorithms presented in this paper have a worst case polynomial time complexity and can provide an exact answer to the invalidation problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.