Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19422430›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2009

A new scenario for the evolutionary origin of hair, feather, and avian scales.

Danielle Dhouailly

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in androgenetic alopecia model research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of long scalp hair in humans.The British journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organotypic 3D Cell Culture of the Embryonic Lacrimal Gland.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Evo Devo of the Vertebrates Integument.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle DhouaillyEquipe Ontogenèse et Cellules Souches du Tégument, Centre de Recherche INSERM UJF - U, Institut Albert Bonniot, Site Santé- La Tronche, Grenoble, France. Danielle.Dhouailly@ujf-grenoble.fr
Institut pour l'avancée des biosciences · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In zoology it is well known that birds are characterized by the presence of feathers, and mammals by hairs. Another common point of view is that avian scales are directly related to reptilian scales. As a skin embryologist, I have been fascinated by the problem of regionalization of skin appendages in amniotes throughout my scientific life. Here I have collected the arguments that result from classical experimental embryology, from the modern molecular biology era, and from the recent discovery of new fossils. These arguments shape my view that avian ectoderm is primarily programmed toward forming feathers, and mammalian ectoderm toward forming hairs. The other ectoderm derivatives - scales in birds, glands in mammals, or cornea in both classes - can become feathers or hairs through metaplastic process, and appear to have a negative regulatory mechanism over this basic program. How this program is altered remains, in most part, to be determined. However, it is clear that the regulation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is a critical hub. The level of beta-catenin is crucial for feather and hair formation, as its down-regulation appears to be linked with the formation of avian scales in chick, and cutaneous glands in mice. Furthermore, its inhibition leads to the formation of nude skin and is required for that of corneal epithelium. Here I propose a new theory, to be further considered and tested when we have new information from genomic studies. With this theory, I suggest that the alpha-keratinized hairs from living synapsids may have evolved from the hypothetical glandular integument of the first amniotes, which may have presented similarities with common day terrestrial amphibians. Concerning feathers, they may have evolved independently of squamate scales, each originating from the hypothetical roughened beta-keratinized integument of the first sauropsids. The avian overlapping scales, which cover the feet in some bird species, may have developed later in evolution, being secondarily derived from feathers.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBirdsEpidermisFeathersFossilsIntegumentary SystemKeratinsMiceModels, BiologicalReptilesKeratins

Identifiers

PMID19422430
PMCPMC2736124
OpenAlexW1992515072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.