Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19421374›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy currents

Driving issues in epilepsy: past, present, and future.

Allan Krumholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy currents. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implications for driving based on the risk of seizures after ischaemic stroke.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  4. EEG biomarker candidates for the identification of epilepsy.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Providing Quality Epilepsy Care for Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Prevalence of patients with epilepsy unfit to drive.Journal of family & community medicine
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Allan KrumholzUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Epilepsy Center Baltimore, Maryland, USA. akrumholz@som.umaryland.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driving restrictions for people with seizure disorders are intended to ensure the public's safety, but driving is of such great importance in the United States that the imposed restrictions also may unduly harm the welfare of these individuals. Because driving restrictions historically have been based more on expert opinion than sound scientific evidence, the appropriateness and application of standards for licensing drivers with seizures continue to raise questions and concerns, as does the role physicians should have in the process. Driving is an important and complex practical concern for physicians who care for people with epilepsy or who may serve as consultants to regulatory authorities, requiring them to be well informed about the relevant issues to properly manage their patients and to protect themselves against lawsuits.

Identifiers

PMID19421374
PMCPMC2673400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.