Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19421321›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2009

Lack of functional benefit with glutamine versus placebo in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a randomized crossover trial.

Elise Mok, Guy Letellier, Jean-Marie Cuisset, André Denjean, Frédéric Gottrand, Corinne Alberti, Régis Hankard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00296621 (Efficacy Study of Oral Glutamine Supplementation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00296621 phase2completednot on this map

Efficacy Study of Oral Glutamine Supplementation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2006 to 2007Enrolled30ConditionsMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneArmsL-Glutamine, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2012
    Review
  14. Glutamine supplementation in sick children: is it beneficial?Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elise MokINSERM Centre D'Investigation Clinique 802, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Guy Letellier
Jean-Marie Cuisset
André Denjean
Frédéric Gottrand
Corinne Alberti
Régis Hankard
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral glutamine decreases whole body protein breakdown in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We evaluated the functional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine in DMD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findings30 ambulant DMD boys were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover trial with 2 intervention periods: glutamine (0.5 g/kg/d) and placebo, 4 months each, separated by a 1-month wash-out, at 3 outpatient clinical investigation centers in France. Functional benefit was tested by comparing glutamine versus placebo on change in walking speed at 4 months. Secondary outcome measures were: 2-minute walk test, work, power, muscle mass (urinary creatinine), markers of myofibrillar protein breakdown (urinary 3-methyl-histidine/creatinine), serum creatine phospho-kinase, body composition (fat free mass, fat mass percentage), safety and oral nutrient intake. There was no improvement in the primary end point (walking speed) or in secondary measures of muscle function (2-minute walk test, work, power) in the glutamine group compared with placebo. However, subjects receiving glutamine or placebo showed no deterioration in functional measures over the course of the 9-month trial. No differences in muscle mass, markers of protein breakdown or serum creatine phosho-kinase were observed, except for a blunted increase in fat free mass in the glutamine group which led to a greater increase in fat mass percentage. Glutamine was safe and well-tolerated.

conclusionsThis trial did not identify additional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine over placebo on muscle mass or function in ambulatory DMD boys. Although apparently safe, current data cannot support routine supplementation in this population as a whole, until further research proves otherwise.

trial registration(ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT00296621.

Indexed as

Administration, OralBody CompositionChildChild, PreschoolCreatinineCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesGlutamineHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMethylhistidinesMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneTreatment Outcome3-methylhistidineCreatinineGlutamineMethylhistidines

Identifiers

PMID19421321
PMCPMC2673684
OpenAlexW2080393469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.