Trial reportPloS one2009
Lack of functional benefit with glutamine versus placebo in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a randomized crossover trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00296621 (Efficacy Study of Oral Glutamine Supplementation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy Study of Oral Glutamine Supplementation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional interventions and dietary supplements in muscle diseases: a systematic review.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Pooled it
- The use of protein supplements in children with cerebral palsy: A scoping literature review.PloS one · 2025Article
- What Nutraceuticals Can Do for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Lessons Learned from Amino Acid Supplementation in Mouse Models.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Human Dystrophin Dp71ab Enhances the Proliferation of Myoblasts Across Species But Not Human Nonmyoblast Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Safety issues and harmful pharmacological interactions of nutritional supplements in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: considerations for Standard of Care and emerging virus outbreaks.Pharmacological research · 2020Review
- Progressive Skeletal Muscle Atrophy in Muscular Dystrophies: A Role for Toll-like Receptor-Signaling in Disease Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- A modified diet does not ameliorate muscle pathology in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.PloS one · 2019Article
- Skeletal Muscle Metabolism in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy-Implications for Therapies.Nutrients · 2018Review
- Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans.Skeletal muscle · 2017Article
- Metabogenic and Nutriceutical Approaches to Address Energy Dysregulation and Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Nutrients · 2015Review
- What has the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy contributed to our understanding of this disease?Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2015Review
- Autophagy is Impaired in the Tibialis Anterior of Dystrophin Null Mice.PLoS currents · 2013Article
- Recent advances in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2012Review
- Glutamine supplementation in sick children: is it beneficial?Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral glutamine decreases whole body protein breakdown in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We evaluated the functional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine in DMD. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findings30 ambulant DMD boys were included in this double-blind, randomized crossover trial with 2 intervention periods: glutamine (0.5 g/kg/d) and placebo, 4 months each, separated by a 1-month wash-out, at 3 outpatient clinical investigation centers in France. Functional benefit was tested by comparing glutamine versus placebo on change in walking speed at 4 months. Secondary outcome measures were: 2-minute walk test, work, power, muscle mass (urinary creatinine), markers of myofibrillar protein breakdown (urinary 3-methyl-histidine/creatinine), serum creatine phospho-kinase, body composition (fat free mass, fat mass percentage), safety and oral nutrient intake. There was no improvement in the primary end point (walking speed) or in secondary measures of muscle function (2-minute walk test, work, power) in the glutamine group compared with placebo. However, subjects receiving glutamine or placebo showed no deterioration in functional measures over the course of the 9-month trial. No differences in muscle mass, markers of protein breakdown or serum creatine phosho-kinase were observed, except for a blunted increase in fat free mass in the glutamine group which led to a greater increase in fat mass percentage. Glutamine was safe and well-tolerated.
conclusionsThis trial did not identify additional benefit of 4 months oral glutamine over placebo on muscle mass or function in ambulatory DMD boys. Although apparently safe, current data cannot support routine supplementation in this population as a whole, until further research proves otherwise.
trial registration(ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT00296621.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.