Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19421199›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology

Developing vaccines against minor capsid antigen L2 to prevent papillomavirus infection.

Balasubramanyam Karanam, Subhashini Jagu, Warner K Huh, Richard B S Roden

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HPV vaccines: Global perspectives.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Virus-based nanoparticles as platform technologies for modern vaccines.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. HPV vaccine: Current status and future directions.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Balasubramanyam KaranamDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Subhashini Jagu
Warner K Huh
Richard B S Roden
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TZYY-CHOOU WU · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
Mechanisms of Papillomavirus NeutralizationR01CA118790 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, RICHARD BRUCE · 2007 to 2018
$2.9M
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of HPV 16 L2 11-200R01CA133749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HUH, WARNER KING · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118790NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subset of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes is responsible for approximately 5% of all cancer deaths globally, and uterine cervical carcinoma accounts for the majority of these cases. The impact of HPV is greatest for women who do not have access to effective secondary preventive measures, and consequently over 80% of cervical cancer deaths worldwide occur in developing nations. The understanding that persistent infection by this 'oncogenic' subset of HPV genotypes is necessary for the development of cervical carcinoma has driven the development of preventive vaccines. Two preventive vaccines comprising recombinant HPV L1 virus-like particles (VLPs) have been licensed. However, the current cost of these vaccines precludes sustained global delivery, and they target only two of the approximately 15 known oncogenic HPV types, although approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases are attributed to these two types and there is evidence for some degree of cross-protection against other closely related types. A possible approach to broader immunity at lower cost is to consider vaccination against L2. L2 vaccines can be produced inexpensively and they also have the promise of conferring much broader cross-type protective immunity than that observed with L1 VLP immunization. However, L2 vaccine development lags behind L1 VLP vaccines and several technical hurdles remain.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCapsid ProteinsFemaleHumansMolecular Sequence DataOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationCapsid ProteinsL2 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19421199
PMCPMC3075576
OpenAlexW2001337352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.