Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19421174›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010

Enrichment of cell subpopulations applying automated MACS technique: purity, recovery and applicability for PCR-based chimerism analysis.

A Willasch, S Eing, G Weber, S Kuçi, G Schneider, J Soerensen, A Jarisch, E Rettinger, U Koehl, T Klingebiel and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. iScience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell Surface Proteins for Enrichment andStem cells international · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A WillaschDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Hemostaseology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Hospital for Children and Adolescents III, Frankfurt, Germany. andre.willasch@kgu.de
S Eing
G Weber
S Kuçi
G Schneider
J Soerensen
A Jarisch
E Rettinger
U Koehl
T Klingebiel
H Kreyenberg
P Bader
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enrichment of cell subpopulations is a prerequisite for lineage-specific chimerism analysis (LCA), a frequent approach in follow-up after allo-SCT. An efficient enrichment technique is Magnetic Cell Sorting (MACS) using the AutoMACS separator. However, evaluation of purity, recovery and applicability for PCR-based chimerism analysis of MACS-enriched subpopulations from post-transplant peripheral blood, providing reduced cell numbers and/or unbalanced proportions of subpopulations, is currently unavailable. We performed enrichment of CD3-, CD14-, CD15-, CD19- and CD56-positive subpopulations using 'Whole Blood MicroBeads' and AutoMACS separator in 137 prospectively collected peripheral blood samples from 15 paediatric patients after allo-CD3-/CD19-depleted SCT. Purity was assessed by immune phenotyping. Recovery and applicability for chimerism analysis was evaluated. Excellent purity >90% was achieved in CD14-, CD15-positive cells in 81%, 95% of the isolates and in 86% of CD3 and CD19 isolates, if ACC was >400 cells per mul. Median purity of CD56-positive isolates was 78.9%. Recovery >90% was between 93 (CD56) and 37% (CD15). Conventional and real-time PCR-based chimerism analysis was feasible in virtually all samples. Isolation of cell subpopulations by automated cell enrichment in post-transplant peripheral blood is feasible and fast providing excellent purity and recovery for routine lineage-specific chimerism analysis.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAdolescentAdultAntigens, CD19CD3 ComplexCD56 AntigenCell SeparationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFlow CytometryHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLewis X AntigenLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLymphocyte SubsetsAntigens, CD19CD3 ComplexCD56 AntigenLewis X AntigenLipopolysaccharide Receptors

Identifiers

PMID19421174
OpenAlexW1975524979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.