The neglected purpose of comparative-effectiveness research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.American journal of epidemiology · 2012
   Pooled it
2. Knowing the ABCs: a comparative effectiveness study of two methods of diabetes education.Patient education and counseling · 2011
   Trial
3. Ultrasound-guided (needle-in-plane) perineural catheter insertion: the effect of catheter-insertion distance on postoperative analgesia.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
   Trial
4. Leadership in practice-based research: The National Dental PBRN.Journal of dentistry · 2019
   Review
5. Rationale and design of Mi-CARE: The mile square colorectal cancer screening, awareness and referral and education project.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017
   Article
6. Translating research into everyday clinical practice: lessons learned from a USA dental practice-based research network.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2013
   Article
7. Insights from a conference on implementing comparative effectiveness research through shared decision-making.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2013
   Article
8. Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
   Review
9. Patient-centered, comparative effectiveness of esophageal cancer screening: protocol for a comparative effectiveness research study to inform guidelines for evidence-based approach to screening and surveillance endoscopy.BMC health services research · 2012
   Article
10. How variability in the institutional review board review process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research.Annals of internal medicine · 2012
    Article
11. Will comparative effectiveness research finally succeed?Biotechnology healthcare · 2012
    Article
12. Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research: are drug and implementation trials equally worth funding?PharmacoEconomics · 2011
    Article
13. Treatment strategies for pelvic organ prolapse: a cost-effectiveness analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2011
    Article
14. Implementation science for the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2010
    Article
15. Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer.Cancer · 2010
    Article
16. The protean role of health care delivery organizations in comparative effectiveness research.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2009
    Article
17. A translational research approach to poor treatment response in patients with schizophrenia: clozapine-antipsychotic polypharmacy.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2009
    Review
18. Clinical research directions in pediatric cardiology.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2009
    Review
19. Swimming upstream: comparative effectiveness research in the US.PharmacoEconomics · 2009
    Article
20. How to Bridge Research Results to Everyday Clinical Care?Operative dentistry
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as