Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19420264›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2009

A genetically mediated bias in decision making driven by failure of amygdala control.

Jonathan P Roiser, Benedetto de Martino, Geoffrey C Y Tan, Dharshan Kumaran, Ben Seymour, Nicholas W Wood, Raymond J Dolan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Genetics of Risk Aversion: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Differential susceptibility effects of theFrontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retrospective Valuation of Experienced Outcome Encoded in Distinct Reward Representations in the Anterior Insula and Amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neural underpinnings of maladaptive decision-making in addictions.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2018
    Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Benedetto de Martino
Geoffrey C Y Tan
Dharshan Kumaran
Ben Seymour
Nicholas W Wood
Raymond J Dolan
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 078865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation at the serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) is associated with altered amygdala reactivity and lack of prefrontal regulatory control. Similar regions mediate decision-making biases driven by contextual cues and ambiguity, for example the "framing effect." We hypothesized that individuals hemozygous for the short (s) allele at the 5-HTTLPR would be more susceptible to framing. Participants, selected as homozygous for either the long (la) or s allele, performed a decision-making task where they made choices between receiving an amount of money for certain and taking a gamble. A strong bias was evident toward choosing the certain option when the option was phrased in terms of gains and toward gambling when the decision was phrased in terms of losses (the frame effect). Critically, this bias was significantly greater in the ss group compared with the lala group. In simultaneously acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging data, the ss group showed greater amygdala during choices made in accord, compared with those made counter to the frame, an effect not seen in the lala group. These differences were also mirrored by differences in anterior cingulate-amygdala coupling between the genotype groups during decision making. Specifically, lala participants showed increased coupling during choices made counter to, relative to those made in accord with, the frame, with no such effect evident in ss participants. These data suggest that genetically mediated differences in prefrontal-amygdala interactions underpin interindividual differences in economic decision making.

Indexed as

BiasBrain MappingAdultAmygdalaAnalysis of VarianceDecision MakingFemaleGenotypeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsOxygenPersonalityPsychophysicsOxygenSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsSLC6A4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19420264
PMCPMC2686091
OpenAlexW2047266385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.