ArticleBMC medical genomics2009
High-resolution analysis of copy number alterations and associated expression changes in ovarian tumors.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Multiomic Characterization of Pre- and Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Ovarian Cancer Reveals Mediators of Tumorigenesis and Chemotherapy Response.Cancer research · 2025Article
- Long Non-Coding, Micro, and Circular RNAs in Ovarian Cancer Metastasis: Pathways and Treatment Approaches.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Synergistic RAS-MAPK and AKT Activation in MYC-Driven Tumors via Adjacent PVT1 Rearrangements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Research progress of ECT2 and RhoA-related signaling pathways in gynecological tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Regulation mechanism and pathogenic role of lncRNA plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (Genes & diseases · 2023Review
- Oncofetal reprogramming in tumour development and progression.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2022Review
- Unravelling similarities and differences in the role of circular and linear PVT1 in cancer and human disease.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Article
- Connecting Cholesterol Efflux Factors to Lung Cancer Biology and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Cellular models of development of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A review of cell of origin and mechanisms of carcinogenesis.Cell proliferation · 2021Review
- Expression ofCancers · 2021Article
- Genome-wide analysis of copy number alterations led to the characterisation of PDCD10 as oncogene in ovarian cancer.Translational oncology · 2021Article
- 8q24.21 Locus: A Paradigm to Link Non-Coding RNAs, Genome Polymorphisms and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Protein kinase Cι promotes UBF1-ECT2 binding on ribosomal DNA to drive rRNA synthesis and transformed growth of non-small-cell lung cancer cells.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Two types of primary mucinous ovarian tumors can be distinguished based on their origin.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Article
- NCEH1 may be a prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020Article
- A feedforward circuit shaped by ECT2 and USP7 contributes to breast carcinogenesis.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Expression of 3q oncogeneOncology letters · 2019Article
- A Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals High-Frequency Genetic Alterations in Mediators of Signaling by the TGF-β Superfamily.Cell systems · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA copy number alterations are frequently observed in ovarian cancer, but it remains a challenge to identify the most relevant alterations and the specific causal genes in those regions.
methodsWe obtained high-resolution 500K SNP array data for 52 ovarian tumors and identified the most statistically significant minimal genomic regions with the most prevalent and highest-level copy number alterations (recurrent CNAs). Within a region of recurrent CNA, comparison of expression levels in tumors with a given CNA to tumors lacking that CNA and to whole normal ovary samples was used to select genes with CNA-specific expression patterns. A public expression array data set of laser capture micro-dissected (LCM) non-malignant fallopian tube epithelia and LCM ovarian serous adenocarcinoma was used to evaluate the effect of cell-type mixture biases.
resultsFourteen recurrent deletions were detected on chromosomes 4, 6, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22 and most prevalently on X and 8. Copy number and expression data suggest several apoptosis mediators as candidate drivers of the 8p deletions. Sixteen recurrent gains were identified on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, and 20, with the most prevalent gains localized to 8q and 3q. Within the 8q amplicon, PVT1, but not MYC, was strongly over-expressed relative to tumors lacking this CNA and showed over-expression relative to normal ovary. Likewise, the cell polarity regulators PRKCI and ECT2 were identified as putative drivers of two distinct amplicons on 3q. Co-occurrence analyses suggested potential synergistic or antagonistic relationships between recurrent CNAs. Genes within regions of recurrent CNA showed an enrichment of Cancer Census genes, particularly when filtered for CNA-specific expression.
conclusionThese analyses provide detailed views of ovarian cancer genomic changes and highlight the benefits of using multiple reference sample types for the evaluation of CNA-specific expression changes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.