Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19419331›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2009

A Multicenter, double-blind trial of a high-dose caspofungin treatment regimen versus a standard caspofungin treatment regimen for adult patients with invasive candidiasis.

Robert F Betts, Marcio Nucci, Deepak Talwar, Marcelo Gareca, Flavio Queiroz-Telles, Roger J Bedimo, Raoul Herbrecht, Guillermo Ruiz-Palacios, Jo-Anne H Young, John W Baddley and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00250432 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of 2 Dosing Regimens of Caspofungin in the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2006 to 2008Enrolled204ConditionsInvasive CandidiasisArmscaspofungin acetate
NCT02413892 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Loading Dose of Caspofungin on Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters Target Achievements for Severe Candida Infections in ICU Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorOutcome ReaRan2015 to 2017Enrolled15ConditionsCandida Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  7. Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: The STRIVE Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Trial
  8. Low Caspofungin Exposure in Patients in Intensive Care Units.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Efficacy of caspofungin as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis compared to standard therapy in a historical cohort.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert F BettsUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Marcio Nucci
Deepak Talwar
Marcelo Gareca
Flavio Queiroz-Telles
Roger J Bedimo
Raoul Herbrecht
Guillermo Ruiz-Palacios
Jo-Anne H Young
John W Baddley
Kim M Strohmaier
Kimberly A Tucker
Arlene F Taylor
Nicholas A Kartsonis
Caspofungin High-Dose Study Group
United States Military Academy · USLehigh Valley Hospital · USUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Minnesota System · USUniversity of Rochester · USVA North Texas Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard caspofungin treatment regimen (50 mg/day after a 70-mg dose on day 1) is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, but experience with higher doses of caspofungin is limited. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of caspofungin at 3 times the standard dosing regimen.

methodsPatients with proven invasive candidiasis were randomized to receive a standard or high-dose (150 mg/day) caspofungin treatment regimen. Safety was assessed in all patients as treated. Efficacy was assessed as a secondary objective in a full-analysis-set population. A favorable overall response was defined as symptom resolution and microbiological clearance at the end of caspofungin therapy.

resultsA total of 204 patients were included in the safety analysis (104 received the standard regimen, and 100 received the high-dose regimen), and 197 were included in the efficacy analysis (102 and 95 in the standard and high-dose treatment groups, respectively). Patient demographic characteristics, neutropenia status (6.7% and 8.0% had neutropenia, respectively), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (mean, 16.5 and 17, respectively) were similar between treatment groups. Significant drug-related adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving the standard regimen and 3.0% of patients receiving the high-dose regimen (difference, 1.1%; 95% confidence interval, -4.1% to 6.8%). The most-common drug-related adverse events in the standard and high-dose treatment groups were phlebitis (3.8% and 2.0%, respectively), increased alkaline phosphatase level (6.9% and 2.0%, respectively), and increased aspartate transaminase level (4.0% and 2.0%, respectively). Overall, 71.6% of patients who received the standard regimen and 77.9% of patients who received the high-dose regimen had favorable overall responses (difference, 6.3%; 95% confidence interval, -5.9% to 18.4%; not statistically significant). Mortality at 8 weeks after therapy was similar between groups.

conclusionsBoth caspofungin dosing regimens were effective and well tolerated in patients with invasive candidiasis. No safety concerns were found for caspofungin at a dosage of 150 mg/day.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlkaline PhosphataseAntifungal AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesCandidiasisCaspofunginDouble-Blind MethodEchinocandinsFemaleHumansLipopeptidesMaleMiddle AgedAlkaline PhosphataseAntifungal AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptides

Identifiers

PMID19419331
OpenAlexW2168334830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.