Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19418238›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2009

Genetic mouse models to investigate cell cycle regulation.

Weimin Li, Shuhei Kotoshiba, Philipp Kaldis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Weimin LiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 3725 MSC, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Shuhei Kotoshiba
Philipp Kaldis
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · SGUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early studies on cell cycle regulation were based on experiments in model systems (Yeast, Xenopus, Starfish, Drosophila) and have shaped the way we understand many events that control the cell cycle. Although these model systems are of great value, the last decade was highlighted by studies done in human cells and using in vivo mouse models. Mouse models are irreplaceable tools for understanding the genetics, development, and survival strategies of mammals. New developments in generating targeting vectors and mutant mice have improved our approaches to study cell cycle regulation and cancer. Here we summarize the most recent advances of mouse model approaches in dissecting the mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and the relevance to human disease.

Indexed as

MiceMice, TransgenicModels, AnimalAnimalsCell CycleGenetic Vectors

Identifiers

PMID19418238
OpenAlexW2090747742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.