ReviewOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2009
Retinal image quality and postnatal visual experience during infancy.
Review in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bifocal use in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia treated with atropine: a proof-of-concept randomized trial.Eye (London, England) · 2023Trial
- How Do Most Young Moderate Hyperopes Avoid Strabismus?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Impact of temporal fluctuations in optical defocus on visual acuity: Empirical results and modeling outcomes.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Combining optical and neural components in physiological visual image quality metrics as functions of luminance and age.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- The Importance of the Interaction Between Ocular Motor Function and Vision During Human Infancy.Annual review of vision science · 2019Review
- Accommodative performance of children with unilateral amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2015Article
- Emmetropization, visual acuity, and strabismus outcomes among hyperopic infants followed with partial hyperopic corrections given in accordance with dynamic retinoscopy.Eye (London, England) · 2014Article
- Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2013Review
- Effects of prematurity on the development of contrast sensitivity: testing the visual experience hypothesis.Vision research · 2013Article
- Which hyperopic patients are destined for trouble?Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2012Article
- The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of animal models have demonstrated that abnormal visual experience can lead to abnormal visual development. The provision of normal optical experience for human infants and children requires an understanding of their typical retinal image quality in the natural dynamic environment. The literature related to this topic is reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.