Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19416832›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Immunization by vaccine-coated microneedle arrays protects against lethal influenza virus challenge.

Qiyun Zhu, Vladimir G Zarnitsyn, Ling Ye, Zhiyuan Wen, Yulong Gao, Lei Pan, Ioanna Skountzou, Harvinder S Gill, Mark R Prausnitz, Chinglai Yang and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-transdermal microneedles for advanced drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Development of vaccine formulations: past, present, and future.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Progress in microneedle array patch (MAP) for vaccine delivery.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microneedle-based intradermal delivery of stabilized dengue virus.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2019
    Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiyun ZhuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Vladimir G Zarnitsyn
Ling Ye
Zhiyuan Wen
Yulong Gao
Lei Pan
Ioanna Skountzou
Harvinder S Gill
Mark R Prausnitz
Chinglai Yang
Richard W Compans
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Self-administered microneedle patches for influenza vaccinesU01AI074579 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COMPANS, RICHARD W · 2007 to 2011
$7.7M
Microneedle-based immunization against pandemic influenzaR01EB006369 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRAUSNITZ, MARK R. · 2007 to 2011
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI074579NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI074579NIBIB NIH HHS EB006369NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza prophylaxis would benefit from a simple method to administer influenza vaccine into skin without the need for hypodermic needles. In this study, solid metal microneedle arrays (MNs) were investigated as a system for cutaneous vaccine delivery using influenza virus antigen. The MNs with 5 monument-shaped microneedles per array were produced and coated with inactivated influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (IIV). As much as 10 microg of viral proteins could be coated onto an array of 5 microneedles, and the coated IIV was delivered into skin at high efficiency within minutes. The coated MNs were used to immunize mice in comparison with conventional intramuscular injection at the same dose. Analysis of immune responses showed that a single immunization with IIV-coated MNs induced strong antibody responses against influenza virus, with significant levels of hemagglutination inhibition activities (>1:40), which were comparable to those induced by conventional intramuscular immunization. Moreover, mice immunized by a single dose of IIV coated on MNs were effectively protected against lethal challenge by a high dose of mouse-adapted influenza virus A/PR/8/34. These results show that MNs are highly effective as a simple method of vaccine delivery to elicit protective immune responses against virus infection.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsAntibodiesCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHemagglutinationHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusImmunizationInfluenza A virusInfluenza VaccinesMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrthomyxoviridaeVaccinesAntibodiesCytokinesHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID19416832
PMCPMC2683119
OpenAlexW2116085039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.