ArticleExperimental neurology2009
Postnatal conversion of cross phrenic activity from an active to latent state.
Article in Experimental neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The crossed phrenic phenomenon.Neural regeneration research · 2017Review
- Slow Breathing Can Be Operantly Conditioned in the Rat and May Reduce Sensitivity to Experimental Stressors.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Article
- The crossed phrenic phenomenon and recovery of function following spinal cord injury.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2009Review
- Identification of the neural pathway underlying spontaneous crossed phrenic activity in neonatal rats.Neuroscience · 2009Article
- The potential role of phrenic nucleus glutamate receptor subunits in mediating spontaneous crossed phrenic activity in neonatal rat.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord hemisection rostral to the phrenic nucleus leads to paralysis of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm and respiratory insufficiency. Recovery of the paralyzed hemidiaphragm may be induced by activating a latent respiratory motor pathway in adult rats. Although the pathway is latent in adults, it may not be latent in neonatal rats as shown by the spontaneous expression of activity over this pathway in an earlier in vitro study. Activity mediated over the latent pathway is known as "crossed phrenic activity". Whether crossed phrenic activity following C2 spinal cord hemisection occurs spontaneously in the neonatal rat in vivo is still unknown. We hypothesized that crossed phrenic activity may be spontaneously expressed in neonates in vivo and may be converted from a spontaneously active state to a latent and nonfunctional state during postnatal development. Thus, a time course study was designed to analyze this activity in rat pups at different ages. The functional status of the ipsilateral and contralateral hemidiaphragms was tested by EMG analysis following hemisection. Crossed phrenic activity was expressed in ventral, lateral, and dorsal parts of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm in P2 and some P3 and P4 neonatal rats. During postnatal development, the activity was observed only in the ventral area of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm in P7, P14, P21 and P28 animals. Significant decreases in the extent of ventral crossed phrenic activity were observed from P2 to P28. The pathway generating this activity becomes latent by postnatal day 35. The present results suggest that spontaneous crossed phrenic activity occurs in vivo following C2 hemisection and the activity gradually decreases during the first four postnatal weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.