ArticleGenome biology2009
Co-evolutionary networks of genes and cellular processes across fungal species.
Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modular 5'-UTR hexamers for context-independent tuning of protein expression in eukaryotes.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Cellular strategies for regulating functional and nonfunctional protein aggregation.Cell reports · 2012Article
- Efficient algorithms for reconstructing gene content by co-evolution.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Association between translation efficiency and horizontal gene transfer within microbial communities.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Expression level, cellular compartment and metabolic network position all influence the average selective constraint on mammalian enzymes.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Analysis of coevolving gene families using mutually exclusive orthologous modules.Genome biology and evolution · 2011Article
- Discovering local patterns of co-evolution: computational aspects and biological examples.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Comparative classification of species and the study of pathway evolution based on the alignment of metabolic pathways.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Reconstructing ancestral gene content by coevolution.Genome research · 2010Article
- Comparison of eukaryotic phylogenetic profiling approaches using species tree aware methods.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of measures such as evolutionary rate and propensity for gene loss have significantly advanced our knowledge of the evolutionary history and selection forces acting upon individual genes and cellular processes.
resultsWe present two new measures, the 'relative evolutionary rate pattern' (rERP), which records the relative evolutionary rates of conserved genes across the different branches of a species' phylogenetic tree, and the 'copy number pattern' (CNP), which quantifies the rate of gene loss of less conserved genes. Together, these measures yield a high-resolution study of the co-evolution of genes in 9 fungal species, spanning 3,540 sets of orthologs. We find that the evolutionary tempo of conserved genes varies in different evolutionary periods. The co-evolution of genes' Gene Ontology categories exhibits a significant correlation with their functional distance in the Gene Ontology hierarchy, but not with their location on chromosomes, showing that cellular functions are a more important driving force in gene co-evolution than their chromosomal proximity. Two fundamental patterns of co-evolution of conserved genes, cooperative and reciprocal, are identified; only genes co-evolving cooperatively functionally back each other up. The co-evolution of conserved and less conserved genes exhibits both commonalities and differences; DNA metabolism is positively correlated with nuclear traffic, transcription processes and vacuolar biology in both analyses.
conclusionsOverall, this study charts the first global network view of gene co-evolution in fungi. The future application of the approach presented here to other phylogenetic trees holds much promise in characterizing the forces that shape cellular co-evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.