Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19416074›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2009

Lessons from structural genomics.

Thomas C Terwilliger, David Stuart, Shigeyuki Yokoyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal 1TEL-target protein linker character is target protein-dependent.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Structural Biology for Target Identification and Validation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Macromolecular crystallography using microcrystal electron diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas C TerwilligerLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA. terwilliger@lanl.gov
David Stuart
Shigeyuki Yokoyama

Funding

Subproject 5U54GM074946 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI TERWILLIGER, THOMAS C. · 2005 to 2009
$20.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade of structural genomics, the large-scale determination of protein structures, has generated a wealth of data and many important lessons for structural biology and for future large-scale projects. These lessons include a confirmation that it is possible to construct large-scale facilities that can determine the structures of a hundred or more proteins per year, that these structures can be of high quality, and that these structures can have an important impact. Technology development has played a critical role in structural genomics, the difficulties at each step of determining a structure of a particular protein can be quantified, and validation of technologies is nearly as important as the technologies themselves. Finally, rapid deposition of data in public databases has increased the impact and usefulness of the data and international cooperation has advanced the field and improved data sharing.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, ProteinInternetChromosome MappingGenomicsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID19416074
PMCPMC2847842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.