Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19415500›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2009

HIV infection and the central nervous system: a primer.

Ronald J Ellis, Patricia Calero, Michael D Stockin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Viral Pandemics of the Last Four Decades: Pathophysiology, Health Impacts and Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Glucocorticoid Receptor Is a Critical Regulator of HIV Latency in Human Microglial Cells.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Scaling Synapses in the Presence of HIV.Neurochemical research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronald J EllisUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103, USA. roellis@ucsd.edu
Patricia Calero
Michael D Stockin

Funding

SOURCES AND NEUROCOGNITIVE CORRELATES ON CSF HIV RNAR01MH058076 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELLIS, RONALD J. · 1997 to 2010
$9.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this brief review is to prepare readers who may be unfamiliar with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and the rapidly accumulating changes in the epidemic by providing an introduction to HIV disease and its treatment. The general concepts presented here will facilitate understanding of the papers in this issue on HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Toward that end, we briefly review the biology of HIV and how it causes disease in its human host, its epidemiology, and how antiretroviral treatments are targeted to interfere with the molecular biology that allows the virus to reproduce. Finally, we describe what is known about how HIV injures the nervous system, leading to HAND, and discuss potential strategies for preventing or treating the effects of HIV on the nervous system.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System DiseasesCognition DisordersHIVHIV InfectionsHumansAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID19415500
PMCPMC2690832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.