Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19414769›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2009

Tumor regulatory T cells potently abrogate antitumor immunity.

Zuqiang Liu, Jin H Kim, Louis D Falo, Zhaoyang You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Both intratumoral regulatory T cell depletion and CTLA-4 antagonism are required for maximum efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Quality of CD8Science advances · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zuqiang LiuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jin H Kim
Louis D Falo
Zhaoyang You

Funding

MECHANISMS OF DENDRITIC CELL BASED TUMOR IMMUNIZATIONP01CA073743 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FINN, OLIVERA J · 1998 to 2009
$12.3M
Mechanisms of cutaneous immunobiology:Skin immune organR01AI060008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FALO, LOUIS D · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
In Vivo Targeted Vaccines for Tumor ImmunotherapyR01CA108813 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YOU, ZHAOYANG · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
Dendritic Cell Threapy for Cutaneous T-Cell LymphomaR01CA106662 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FALO, LOUIS D · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA073743NCI NIH HHS P01CA73743NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106662NCI NIH HHS R01CA106662NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108813NCI NIH HHS R01CA108813NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI060008NIAID NIH HHS R01AI060008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory T cell (Treg) from mice bearing a breast tumor were elevated (tumor Treg). In vitro, whereas tumor Treg ability to inhibit tumor-primed CD4(+) T cell activity is comparable to Treg from naive mice (naive Treg), only tumor Treg suppress naive CD8(+) T cell activation and DC function. Neither tumor Treg nor naive Treg can suppress antitumor immunity at the effector phase of the immune response induced by adoptively transferred tumor-primed CD4(+) T cells. This is consistent with the observation that, in this model, neither tumor Treg nor naive Treg can inhibit effectors in vitro or in vivo. However, tumor Treg abrogate tumor-specific CD8(+) T cell responses in tumor-draining lymph nodes and antitumor immunity at the early stage of the immune response induced by adoptively transferred tumor-primed CD4(+) T cells. These data indicate that, in this model, tumor Treg potently abrogate tumor-specific CD8(+) T cell responses in tumor-draining lymph nodes, thereby suppressing antitumor immunity at the early stage of the immune response induced by adoptively transferred tumor-primed CD4(+) T cells.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleLymphocyte ActivationMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CT-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

Identifiers

PMID19414769
PMCPMC2731421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.