Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19414742›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2009

Cutting Edge: Unusual NK cell responses to HIV-1 peptides are associated with protection against maternal-infant transmission of HIV-1.

Caroline T Tiemessen, Sharon Shalekoff, Stephen Meddows-Taylor, Diana B Schramm, Maria A Papathanasopoulos, Glenda E Gray, Gayle G Sherman, Ashraf H Coovadia, Louise Kuhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. NK Cell-Mediated Recall Responses: Memory-Like, Adaptive, or Antigen-Specific?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline T TiemessenAIDS Virus Research Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Private Bag X4, Sandringham, South Africa.
Sharon Shalekoff
Stephen Meddows-Taylor
Diana B Schramm
Maria A Papathanasopoulos
Glenda E Gray
Gayle G Sherman
Ashraf H Coovadia
Louise Kuhn

Funding

HIV Protective Immunity and Perinatal ExposureR01HD042402 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUHN, LOUISE · 2002 to 2006
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042402Wellcome Trust 076352Wellcome Trust 076352/Z/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most infants exposed to HIV-1 in utero and at delivery do not acquire infection. We show that mothers and infants who have CD3-negative cells that respond to HIV-1 peptides are substantially less likely to transmit and acquire infection, respectively. The CD3-negative cells, shown to be NK cells, respond with remarkable specificity and high magnitude to HIV-1 peptides from Env (envelope) and Reg (regulatory) protein regions, as measured by a whole blood intracellular cytokine assay only in the context of HIV-1 infection or exposure. These findings identify an important new measure of protective immunity to HIV-1 that highlights the importance of innate immunity in preventing the establishment of HIV-1 infection.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalCD3 ComplexCytokinesFemaleFlow CytometryHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornKiller Cells, NaturalPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousViral ProteinsCD3 ComplexCytokinesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19414742
PMCPMC2841685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.