Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19414471›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2009

Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Emma Hine, Stephen F Chenoweth, Howard D Rundle, Mark W Blows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Variation in mutational (co)variances.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Phenotypic stasis with genetic divergence.Peer community journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the mossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Quantitative genetic variance and multivariate clines in the Ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma HineSchool of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. e.hine@uq.edu.au
Stephen F Chenoweth
Howard D Rundle
Mark W Blows

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining how genetic variance changes under selection in natural populations has proved to be a very resilient problem in evolutionary genetics. In the same way that understanding the availability of genetic variance within populations requires the simultaneous consideration of genetic variance in sets of functionally related traits, determining how genetic variance changes under selection in natural populations will require ascertaining how genetic variance-covariance (G) matrices evolve. Here, we develop a geometric framework using higher-order tensors, which enables the empirical characterization of how G matrices have diverged among populations. We then show how divergence among populations in genetic covariance structure can then be associated with divergence in selection acting on those traits using key equations from evolutionary theory. Using estimates of G matrices of eight male sexually selected traits from nine geographical populations of Drosophila serrata, we show that much of the divergence in genetic variance occurred in a single trait combination, a conclusion that could not have been reached by examining variation among the individual elements of the nine G matrices. Divergence in G was primarily in the direction of the major axes of genetic variance within populations, suggesting that genetic drift may be a major cause of divergence in genetic variance among these populations.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationModels, GeneticAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDrosophilaMaleSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19414471
PMCPMC2691006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.