Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19414117›Full record

ReviewUrologic oncology

Identification, characterization, and biological relevance of prostate cancer stem cells from clinical specimens.

Susan Kasper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologic oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Role of BioResponse 3,3'-Diindolylmethane in the Treatment of Human Prostate Cancer: Clinical Experience.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The cancer stem cell niche--there goes the neighborhood?International journal of cancer · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susan KasperDepartment of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA. susan.kasper@uc.edu

Funding

Development of Androgen Independent Prostate CancerR01DK060957 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KASPER, SUSAN · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK060957NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK60957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a reservoir of tumor cells that exhibit the properties of self-renewal and the ability to re-establish the heterogeneous cell population of a tumor. They appear therapy-resistant and may be the underlying cause of recurrent disease. Using prostate as a model, this review presents the CSC hypothesis and discusses the role of the androgen receptor in CSCs, the methods used for isolating CSCs, and the therapeutic challenges CSCs have for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorEpithelial CellsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplastic Stem CellsProstateProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID19414117
PMCPMC2799332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.