ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2009
New selective estrogen and androgen receptor modulators.
Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Combined Treatment With Selective Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Modulators Ostarine and Raloxifen on Bone Tissue In Ovariectomized Rats.Calcified tissue international · 2025Article
- Dihydrotestosterone, a robust promoter of osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation: understanding of time-mannered and dose-dependent control of bone forming cells.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2017Article
- Understanding breast cancer - The long and winding road.BBA clinical · 2017Review
- Compounds fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017Article
- Estrogens and Androgens in Skeletal Physiology and Pathophysiology.Physiological reviews · 2017Review
- Tamoxifen regulation of sphingolipid metabolism--Therapeutic implications.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015Review
- Interaction between bone and muscle in older persons with mobility limitations.Current pharmaceutical design · 2014Review
- Osteoporosis in men.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2013Review
- How sex hormones promote skeletal muscle regeneration.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2013Review
- Effect of the combination of metformin and fenofibrate on glucose homeostasis in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2013Article
- Article
- Conceptualizing the role of estrogens and serotonin in the development and maintenance of bulimia nervosa.Clinical psychology review · 2010Review
- Breast and prostate cancer: more similar than different.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe present review focuses on the most significant recent findings regarding selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). SERMs, which interact with estrogen receptor-alpha and estrogen receptor-beta in multiple tissues, continue to generate clinical interest in potential applications in as many disorders as the tissues in which the two known receptors are found. SARMs have been demonstrated to have fewer clinical applications to date, but continue to be investigated for use in multiple disorders in which androgen receptor modulation is likely to be important. Both types of compounds hold great promise for therapeutic use in multiple hormonal disorders involving tissue-specific effects mediated by estrogen or androgen receptors. RECENT
findingsAlthough SERMs have been available for clinical use for 50 years, recent investigation has focused on large randomized clinical trials for newer indications of older agents or smaller clinical trials of newer agents with improved clinical activity and reduced side effects in specific tissues. In particular, the large, prospective, randomized, controlled, multiyear Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene and Raloxifene Use in the Heart clinical trials have recently shown interesting similarities and differences between tamoxifen and raloxifene in estrogen-responsive tissues. Lasofoxifene and arzoxifene are two newer SERMs that have recently been demonstrated to improve bone mineral density and lower serum cholesterol values compared with older SERMs in smaller clinical trials. SARMs are a newer category of drug still being investigated mostly at the basic and preclinical level, with fewer clinical trials available for review. SARMs are currently being investigated mostly for use in prostate cancer at different stages but hold promise for multiple other applications. SUMMARY: Recent clinical trials indicate that SERMs are useful in treatment of disorders of bone and mineral metabolism and breast cancer and in reduction of cardiovascular risk factors. SARMs offer important benefits for management of prostate cancer at different stages, as well as other disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.