Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19412100›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2009

New selective estrogen and androgen receptor modulators.

Bart L Clarke, Sundeep Khosla

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Compounds fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Osteoporosis in men.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2013
    Review
  9. How sex hormones promote skeletal muscle regeneration.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bart L ClarkeMayo Clinic W18-A, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Sundeep Khosla
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

SEX STEROIDS, GROWTH FACTORS, &BONE CELL FUNCTIONP01AG004875 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 1985 to 2019
$30.8M
PATHOGENESIS OF SARCOPENIA AND METABOLIC CHANGE IN AGINGP01AG014383 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI NAIR, K. SREEKUMARAN · 1998 to 2004
$6.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG004875NIA NIH HHS P01 AG014383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe present review focuses on the most significant recent findings regarding selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). SERMs, which interact with estrogen receptor-alpha and estrogen receptor-beta in multiple tissues, continue to generate clinical interest in potential applications in as many disorders as the tissues in which the two known receptors are found. SARMs have been demonstrated to have fewer clinical applications to date, but continue to be investigated for use in multiple disorders in which androgen receptor modulation is likely to be important. Both types of compounds hold great promise for therapeutic use in multiple hormonal disorders involving tissue-specific effects mediated by estrogen or androgen receptors. RECENT

findingsAlthough SERMs have been available for clinical use for 50 years, recent investigation has focused on large randomized clinical trials for newer indications of older agents or smaller clinical trials of newer agents with improved clinical activity and reduced side effects in specific tissues. In particular, the large, prospective, randomized, controlled, multiyear Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene and Raloxifene Use in the Heart clinical trials have recently shown interesting similarities and differences between tamoxifen and raloxifene in estrogen-responsive tissues. Lasofoxifene and arzoxifene are two newer SERMs that have recently been demonstrated to improve bone mineral density and lower serum cholesterol values compared with older SERMs in smaller clinical trials. SARMs are a newer category of drug still being investigated mostly at the basic and preclinical level, with fewer clinical trials available for review. SARMs are currently being investigated mostly for use in prostate cancer at different stages but hold promise for multiple other applications. SUMMARY: Recent clinical trials indicate that SERMs are useful in treatment of disorders of bone and mineral metabolism and breast cancer and in reduction of cardiovascular risk factors. SARMs offer important benefits for management of prostate cancer at different stages, as well as other disorders.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsBone Diseases, MetabolicBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsAndrogen AntagonistsReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID19412100
PMCPMC2860534
OpenAlexW2067941877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.