Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19411607›Full record

ArticleGenome research2009

Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny.

Hao Zhao, Guillaume Bourque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Banding cytogenetics of chimeric hybridsComparative cytogenetics · 2018
    Article
  6. Banding cytogenetics of the Barbary partridgeComparative cytogenetics · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The precarious prokaryotic chromosome.Journal of bacteriology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hao ZhaoComputational and Mathematical Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
Guillaume Bourque

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of genome rearrangements provides a global view on the evolution of a set of related species. We present a new algorithm called EMRAE (efficient method to recover ancestral events) to reliably predict a wide-range of rearrangement events in the ancestry of a group of species. Using simulated data sets, we show that EMRAE achieves comparable sensitivity but significantly higher specificity when predicting evolutionary events relative to other tools to study genome rearrangements. We apply our approach to the synteny blocks of six mammalian genomes (human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, mouse, rat, and dog) and predict 1109 rearrangement events, including 831 inversions, 15 translocations, 237 transpositions, and 26 fusions/fissions. Studying the sequence features at the breakpoints of the primate rearrangement events, we demonstrate that they are not only enriched in segmental duplications (SDs), but that the enrichment of matching pairs of SDs is even stronger within the pairs of breakpoints associated with recovered events. We also show that pairs of L1 repeats are frequently associated with ancestral inversions across all studied lineages. Together, this substantiates the model that regions of high sequence identity have been associated with rearrangement events throughout the mammalian phylogeny.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomePhylogenyAnimalsChromosome BreakageGene RearrangementHumansMammalsModels, GeneticSynteny

Identifiers

PMID19411607
PMCPMC2675982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.