Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19411170›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2009

The basal initiation machinery: beyond the general transcription factors.

Timothy W Sikorski, Stephen Buratowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. DNA looping mediates cooperative transcription activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Core Promoter Is a Regulatory Hub for Developmental Gene Expression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Dynamics of RNA polymerase II and elongation factor Spt4/5 recruitment during activator-dependent transcription.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy W SikorskiDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Stephen Buratowski

Funding

The RNA polymerase II transcription complexR01GM046498 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI BURATOWSKI, STEPHEN · 1996 to 2024
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro experiments led to a simple model in which basal transcription factors sequentially assembled with RNA Polymerase II to generate a preinitiation complex (PIC). Emerging evidence indicates that PIC composition is not universal, but promoter-dependent. Active promoters are occupied by a mixed population of complexes, including regulatory factors such as NC2, Mot1, Mediator, and TFIIS. Recent studies are expanding our understanding of the roles of these factors, demonstrating that their functions are both broader and more context dependent than previously realized.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticHumansModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA Polymerase IITranscription FactorsRNA Polymerase IITranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19411170
PMCPMC2692371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.