Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19409389›Full record

ArticleGeneral and comparative endocrinology2009

Urotensin I-CRF-Urocortins: a mermaid's tail.

Quentin J Pittman, Morley D Hollenberg

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in General and comparative endocrinology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quentin J Pittman
Morley D Hollenberg
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR 15116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the individual perspective of the two authors who were long-time colleagues of Karl Lederis at the University of Calgary, the events and personal interactions are described, that are relevant to the discovery of Urotensin I (UI) in the Lederis laboratory, along with the concurrent discovery of Urotensin II (UII) in the Bern laboratory and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF/CRH) in the Vale laboratory. The fortuitous sabbatical experiences that put Professors Lederis and Bern on the track of the Urotensins, along with the essential isolation paradigm that resulted in the complete sequencing and synthesis of UI and UII are summarized. The chance interaction between Drs. Vale and Lederis who, prior to the publications of the sequences of UI and CRF, realized the sequence commonalities of these peptides with the vasoactive frog peptide, sauvagine, is outlined. Further, the relationship between the pharmacological studies done with UI in the Calgary laboratory and the more recent understanding of the biology and receptor pharmacology for the entire Urotensin I-CRF-Urocortin peptide family is dealt with. The value of a comparative endocrinology approach to understanding hormone action is emphasized, along with a projection to the future, based on new hypotheses that can be generated by unexplained data already in the literature. Based on the previously described pharmacology of the UI-CRF-Urocortin peptides in a number of target tissues, it is suggested that the use of current molecular approaches can be integrated with a 'classical' pharmacological approach to generate new insights about the UI-CRF-Urocortin hormone family.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneEndocrinologyFishesHumansUrocortinsUrotensinsCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneUrocortinsurotensin IUrotensins

Identifiers

PMID19409389
PMCPMC3569504
OpenAlexW2140658858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.