Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19409036›Full record

ReviewCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals2009

Affinity and avidity in antibody-based tumor targeting.

Stephen I Rudnick, Gregory P Adams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cytotoxicity ofEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. It's a match: use of the radionuclide theranostic pairEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Affinity targeting of therapeutic proteins to the bone surface-local delivery of sclerostin-neutralizing antibody enhances efficacy.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen I RudnickMolecular Medicine Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Gregory P Adams

Funding

Defining the Role of Affinity in Antibody-Based Tumor Targeting and PenetrationR01CA118159 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI ADAMS, GREGORY P · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01 CA118159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many factors contribute to successful tumor targeting by antibodies. Besides properties of the tumor tissue and general antibody pharmacology, a relationship exists between an antibody and its antigen that can shape penetration, catabolism, specificity, and efficacy. The affinity and avidity of the binding interactions play critical roles in these dynamics. In this work, we review the principles that guide models predicting tumor penetration and cellular internalization while providing a critical overview of studies aimed at experimentally determining the specific role of affinity and avidity in these processes. One should gain the perspective that binding affinity can, in part, dictate the localization of antibodies in tumors, leading to high concentrations in the perivascular space or low concentrations diffused throughout the tumor. These patterns can be simply due to the diminution of available dose by binding antigen and are complicated by internalization and degradation stemming from slow rates of dissociation. As opposed to the trend of simply increasing affinity to increase efficacy, novel strategies that increase avidity and broaden specificity have made significant progress in tumor targeting.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody AffinityAntibody SpecificityAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin FragmentsMiceNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin Fragments

Identifiers

PMID19409036
PMCPMC2902227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.