Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19408041›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2010

Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: current practices in Ireland.

M J O'Grady, G Mujtaba, J Hanaghan, D Gallagher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M J O'GradyDepartment of Paediatrics, Mayo General Hospital, Castlebar, Co, Mayo, Republic of Ireland. michael_ogrady2001@hotmail.com
G Mujtaba
J Hanaghan
D Gallagher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo ascertain the current approach to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the Republic of Ireland.

methodsTwo-pronged prospective and retrospective study. (1) Postal questionnaire to consultant paediatricians responsible for the routine neonatal care of infants in the Irish Republic in June 2006. (2) Retrospective database review to identify infants undergoing radiological follow-up and their outcome.

resultsAll maternity units surveyed responded. Most units (84%) were dependent on radiographs at 4-6 months for imaging hips, only two units primarily used ultrasound (10.5%). We estimate that neonatal hip examination is performed by an experienced examiner in less than 30% of routine newborn examinations. On retrospective analysis, 94% of radiographs performed were normal.

conclusionsThe most effective interventions, selective ultrasound and examination by an experienced clinician are not widely practiced. There is a need for the development of national guidelines based on available resources.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningFemaleHealth Care SurveysHip Dislocation, CongenitalHip InjuriesHip JointHumansInfant, NewbornIrelandMalePediatricsProspective StudiesRadiographyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.