Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19406886›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Long term monitoring in patients receiving treatment to lower blood pressure: analysis of data from placebo controlled randomised controlled trial.

Katherine Keenan, Andrew Hayen, Bruce C Neal, Les Irwig

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Evidence-based tests to monitor adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: rapid reviews and consensus process.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reply: Personalization of therapy and polypills.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Chapter 8: Future directions and controversies.Kidney international supplements · 2012
    Article
  17. The basis for monitoring strategies in clinical guidelines: a case study of prostate-specific antigen for monitoring in prostate cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine KeenanScreening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, Building A27, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Andrew Hayen
Bruce C Neal
Les Irwig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the value of monitoring blood pressure by quantifying the probability that observed changes in blood pressure reflect true changes.

designAnalysis of blood pressure measurements of patients in the perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study (PROGRESS).

settingRandomised placebo controlled trial carried out in 172 centres in Asia, Australasia, and Europe.

participants1709 patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack randomised to fixed doses of perindopril and indapamide. Measurements Mean of two blood pressure measurements in patients receiving treatment recorded to the nearest 2 mm Hg with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer at baseline and then at three months, six months, nine months, and 15 months and then every six months to 33 months.

resultsThere was no change in the mean blood pressure of the cohort during the 33 month follow-up. Six months after blood pressure was stabilised on treatment, if systolic blood pressure was measured as having increased by >10 mm Hg, six of those measurements would be false positives for every true increase of >or=10 mm Hg. The corresponding value for an increase of 20 mm Hg was over 200. Values for 5 mm Hg and 10 mm Hg increases in diastolic blood pressure were 3.5 and 39, respectively. The likelihood that observed increases in blood pressure reflected true increases rose with the time between measurements such that the ratio of true positives to false positives reached parity at 21 months.

conclusionsUsual clinical approaches to the monitoring of patients taking drugs to lower blood pressure have a low probability of yielding reliable information about true changes in blood pressure. Evidence based guidelines for monitoring treatment response are urgently required to guide clinical practice. Trial registration Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationDiastoleFemaleHumansHypertensionIndapamideIschemic Attack, TransientLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedPerindoprilSecondary PreventionStrokeTreatment FailureAntihypertensive AgentsIndapamidePerindopril

Identifiers

PMID19406886
PMCPMC2675695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.