Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19404580›Full record

ArticleInfection2009

Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS): lessons from an international sepsis registry.

R Beale, K Reinhart, F M Brunkhorst, G Dobb, M Levy, G Martin, C Martin, G Ramsey, E Silva, B Vallet and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02843685 (Regression Discontinuity Designs to Evaluate Real-world Effectiveness), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02843685 completednot on this map

Regression Discontinuity Designs to Evaluate Real-world Effectiveness: a Case Study of Drotrecogin Alpha

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston Medical CenterRan2002Enrolled12,492ConditionsSepsisArmsDrotrecogin alfa activated
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Presentation and outcomes of sepsis in the cardiac intensive care unit.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

R BealeAdult Intensive Care Unit, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, SE1 7EH, London, UK. Richard.Beale@gstt.nhs.uk
K Reinhart
F M Brunkhorst
G Dobb
M Levy
G Martin
C Martin
G Ramsey
E Silva
B Vallet
J-L Vincent
J M Janes
S Sarwat
M D Williams
PROGRESS Advisory Board

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PROGRESS Registry (Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis) was designed to provide comparative data reflecting everyday clinical practice, thereby allowing participating institutions to explore and benchmark medical interventions in severe sepsis. MATERIALS AND

methodsPROGRESS was an international, noninterventional, prospective, observational registry collecting data that describe the management and outcomes of severe sepsis patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Patients were enrolled who had been diagnosed with severe sepsis (suspected or proven infection and >or= 1 acute sepsis-induced organ dysfunction) at the participating institutions, where de-identified data were entered directly into a secured website. PROGRESS was governed by an independent international medical advisory board.

resultsPROGRESS took place in 276 ICUs in 37 countries, and 12,881 patients were identified as having severe sepsis. There was considerable variation among countries in enrollment levels, provision of standard treatment and supportive therapies, and ICU and hospital outcomes. Eight countries accounted for 65.2% of the enrolled patients. Males (59.3%) and Caucasian (48.6%) patients predominated the patient cohort. Diagnosis of severe sepsis was prior to ICU admission in 45.7% of patients, at ICU admission in 29.1% of patients, and after ICU admission in the remainder. Globally, ICU and hospital mortality rates were 39.2% and 49.6%, respectively. The mean length of ICU and hospital stay was 14.6 days and 28.2 days, respectively.

conclusionsThe PROGRESS international sepsis registry demonstrates that a large web-based sepsis registry is feasible. Wide variations in outcomes and use of sepsis therapies were observed between countries. These results also suggest that additional opportunities exist across countries to improve severe sepsis outcomes.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAdolescentAdultAgedAPACHEBenchmarkingCohort StudiesCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.