Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19404214›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2009

Classification by mass spectrometry can accurately and reliably predict outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib-containing regimen.

Stuart Salmon, Heidi Chen, Shuo Chen, Roy Herbst, Anne Tsao, Hai Tran, Alan Sandler, Dean Billheimer, Yu Shyr, Ju-Whei Lee and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Added value of a serum proteomic signature in the diagnostic evaluation of lung nodules.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lung cancer proteomics: recent advances in biomarker discovery.International journal of proteomics · 2011
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart SalmonCarolinas Hematology/Oncology Association, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Heidi Chen
Shuo Chen
Roy Herbst
Anne Tsao
Hai Tran
Alan Sandler
Dean Billheimer
Yu Shyr
Ju-Whei Lee
Pierre Massion
Julie Brahmer
Joan Schiller
David Carbone
Thao P Dang
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
TARGETING NOTCH 3 IN LUNG CANCERP50CA090949 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MASSION, PIERRE P. · 2001 to 2011
$24.1M
Johns Hopkins University NCTN Lead Academic Site ProgramU10CA180802 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, DEBORAH K, BRAHMER, JULIE RENEE · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090949NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough many lung cancers express the epidermal growth factor receptor and the vascular endothelial growth factor, only a small fraction of patients will respond to inhibitors of these pathways. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MS) has shown promise in biomarker discovery, potentially allowing the selection of patients who may benefit from such therapies. Here, we use a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization MS proteomic algorithm developed from a small dataset of erlotinib-bevacizumab treated patients to predict the clinical outcome of patients treated with erlotinib alone.

methodsPretreatment serum collected from patients in a phase I/II study of erlotinib in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent or refractory non-small cell lung cancer was used to develop a proteomic classifier. This classifier was validated using an independent treatment cohort and a control population.

resultA proteomic profile based on 11 distinct m/z features was developed. This predictive algorithm was associated with outcome using the univariate Cox proportional hazard model in the training set (p = 0.0006 for overall survival; p = 0.0012 for progression-free survival). The signature also predicted overall survival and progression-free survival outcome when applied to a blinded test set of patients treated with erlotinib alone on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3503 (n = 82, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0018, respectively) but not when applied to a cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone (n = 61, p = 0.128).

conclusionThe independently derived classifier supports the hypothesis that MS can reliably predict the outcome of patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorErlotinib HydrochlorideQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID19404214
PMCPMC3563261
OpenAlexW2013626702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.